SURENDRA NATH SAHAY And ANR vs ANIL KUMAR VARSHNEY And ANR

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
['RAHUL GUPTA', '', 'NIYATI SAH', 'BIBHASH SINHA', 'MANISH KUMAR']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

M.A. No.187 of 2010

------

1. Surendra Nath Sahay

2. Sunil Kumar Sahay

....

….

Appellants

Versus

1. Smt. Chanchal Lata Devi

2. Nagmani Kumar

3. Chandramani Kumar

4. Smt. Siyawati Devi

5. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Giridih

....

Respondents

WITH

M.A. No.186 of 2010

------

1. Surendra Nath Sahay

2. Sunil Kumar Sahay

....

….

Appellants

Versus

1. Anil Kumar Varshney

2. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

....

Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY

For the Appellants

: Mr. Bibhash Sinha, Advocate

For the Respondents : Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate

Mr. Arvind Kumar Lall, Advocate

C.A.V. ON: 06.04.2022

PRONOUNCED ON: 02.08.2022

Both these appeals have been preferred by the owner and driver of the

offending vehicle against the award of compensation in Claim Case No.46 of

2002 and Claim Case No.06 of 2002 in which the liability to pay the

compensation amou