SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ROHIT KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['SUNIL KUMAR GANJHU', '', 'ASHISH KUMAR', 'RUPESH KUMAR GANJHU', 'NEHALA SHARMIN']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

A.B.A. No. 5122 of 2021

------

Rohit Kumar … Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

Opposite Party

------

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

------

For the Petitioner

: Mr. Sunil Kr. Ganjhu, Advocate

For the State

: Mrs. Nehala Sharmin, Addl. P.P.

------

Order No.02 Dated- 05.08.2021

Heard the parties through video conferencing.

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court

for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Khunti

(AHTU) P.S. Case No.13 of 2020 (G.R. No. 358 of 2021) registered

under sections 363/370(4)/371/374 of the Indian Penal Code and

under Section 16/18 of Bonded Labour System Abolition Act.

The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner took the

minor victim girls to engage them as bonded labour. It is further

submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false

and the victim in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C.

has categor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top