SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SMT TAPSI CHOUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['MAHESH TEWARI', '', 'SURESH PANDEY', 'GANESH PATHAK', 'APP', '', 'KRISHANU RAY', 'INDRAJIT SINHA', 'MD MOKHTAR KHAN', 'AJAY KUMAR SAH', 'ARPAN MISHRA']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Cr. Revision No.272 of 2013

Smt. Tapsi Choudhary

..… Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. Union of India

2. State of Jharkhand

3. Inspector of Police,

CBI, AHD, Ranchi

4. Deputy Superintendent of Police,

C.B.I. SC-III, New Delhi

5. Rabi Bipin Parikh

6. Swaroop Chakraborty

7. Rabindra Kumar Behra

…. Opposite Party(s)

-----

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN

-----

For the Petitioner(s)

: Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate

For the State

: APP

For the Opposite Party(s) : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate

: Mr. Bibhas Sinha, Advocate

-----

CAV on: 12/07/2019

Pronounced on: 06/09/2019

JUDGEMENT

The instant revision application is preferred for setting

aside the order dated 21.01.2013 passed by the learned court of

Special Judicial Magistrate, CBI in Case No. R.C.13(S)/2009,

whereby the petitioner’s prayer for alteration/addition of charge

under Section 216 of Cr. P.C has been rejected.

The instant case has a chequered history. As per the

informant, on 09.05.2009, about seven girls and four boys

including the informant, who were part of Air Hostess Academy,

Chandra Centre, Sakchi, had joined Hotel Sonn

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top