HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND - PRINCIPAL BENCH JHARKHAND
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HAZARIBAGH – Appellant
Versus
SARLU OHDAR – Respondent
C.M.P. 330/2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.M.P. No. 330 of 2018
Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh
… Petitioner
Versus
Sarlu Ohdar & Ors.
…
Opposite Parties
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner
: Mr. Sharahbil Ahmed, A.C. to S.C. Mines I
For the opposite parties
: Mr. Jitesh Kumar, Adv.
05 / 04.02.2022
Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
this petition has been filed to restore F.A. No. 185 of 2012 to its
original file. It is next submitted that the said F.A. No. 185 of 2012
was dismissed because of non-compliance of the peremptory order
to remove the defects within six weeks and the only defect to be
removed was to pay the requisite court fees which could not be
removed within the stipulated time. It is further submitted that
the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in this case and
unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be
highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that F.A. No. 185 of 2012
be restored to its original file.
Learned counsel for the opposite party on the other
hand vehemently opposes the prayer for restoration of F.A. No.
185 of 2012 and submits that the State is deliberately harassing the
opposite parties by not paying the land acquisition compensation
without any plausible reason and taking the plea that the matter is
pending before the Court, hence, the opposite parties have
suffered huge amount of loss because of delay occasioned in
payment of land acquisition compensation awarded, hence, the
opposite parties be compensated by adequate costs.
Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned
counsels, F.A. No. 185of 2012 is restored to its original file subject
to petitioner paying the cost of Rs. 20,000/- to the opposite parties
through the counsel appearing in the record within four weeks,
failing which, this conditional order shall not be given effect to and
this civil miscellaneous petition shall stand dismissed without
further reference to the Bench.
In case, the petitioner files the proof of payment of cost
of Rs. 20,000/- to the opposite parties through the counsel
appearing in the record within four weeks, F.A. No. 185 of 2012
shall be listed at the stage, at which it was before its dismissal,
after one week from the date of filing of proof of payment of the
costs.
This civil miscellaneous petition is disposed of
accordingly.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.