SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND - PRINCIPAL BENCH JHARKHAND
SMT DURGA MAHATA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['PANKAJ VERMA', '', 'VIKESH KUMAR', 'SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY', '', 'CHANDRAJIT MUKHERJEE']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

A.B.A. No.5803 of 2022

------

1. Smt. Durga Mahata

2. Bijay Kumar Mahata @ Bijoy Kumar Mahata

3. Smt. Mousumi Mahata @ Mousumi Mahata

....

....

….

Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Madhumita Mahato

....

....

....Opposite Parties

------

CORAM

: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

------

For the Petitioners

: Mr. Pankaj Verma, Advocate

For the State

: Mr. Subodh Kr. Dubey, Addl.P.P

For the informant

: Mr. Chandrajit Mukherjee, Adv.

------

Order No.02 Dated- 10.08.2022

Heard the learned counsel for the parties .

Apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 96 of

2021 instituted under Sections 498-A, 313, 354, 406 and 34 of the Indian Penal

Code, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of

anticipatory bail.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner no.1

is mother-in-law, petitioner no.2 is brother-in-law and petitioner no.3 is married

sister-in-law of the complainant. It is submitted that the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top