SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RASHID KHAN AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['ANURAG KASHYAP', '', 'LINA SHAKTI', 'SANJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA APP', '', 'MD IMTIAZ KHAN']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Cr. Revision No. 682 of 2014

---

1.Md. Rashid Khan

2.Md. Yasin Khan

Petitioner(s)

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

Opp. Party(s)

---

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN

---

For the Petitioner(s)

: Mr. A.K.Kashyap, Sr. Advocate

Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate

For the State

: Mr. Sanjay Srivastava, A.P.P

For the Informant

: Mr. M. I. Khan, Advocate

---

10/06.03.2020: This revision application is directed against the judgment

dated 13th May, 2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions

Judge-IV, Palamau at Daltonganj in Cr. Appeal No. 124 of 2012,

whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioners was dismissed and

the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 13th

September, 2012, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st

Class, Palamau, Daltonganj in Complaint Case No. 691 of 2001,

corresponding to T.R. No. 575 of 2012, whereby the petitioners

were convicted for the offence under Section 498 A of the I.P.C.

and were further directed to undergo S.I. for on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top