SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KISHORE KUMAR GURUNG – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION AND ANR – Respondent


Advocates:
['VISHNU KUMAR SHARMA', '', 'JYOTI PRAKASH', 'JITENDRA KUMAR', 'RAJIV SINHA']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W.P.(S) No. 811 of 2015

Kishore Kumar Gurung

…....

Petitioner

Vrs.

1.The Union of India through the Staff Selection Commission,

Eastern Zone, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and

Pension, Dept. of Personnel & Training, Govt. of India, Kolkata

2. The Deputy Director, S.S.C, Eastern Zone,Ministry of Personnel, Public

Grievances and Pension, Dept. of Personnel & Training,

Govt. of India, Kolkata

.....

Respondents

…....

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH

For the Petitioners

: Mr. Vishnu Kumar Sharma

For the Respondents

: Mrs. Bakshi Vibha, Sr.P.C. &

Mr. Laxman Kumar, C.G.C

06/25.01.2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Petitioner claims that his candidature has not been

rejected on proper grounds by refusing him age relaxation as a

Schedule Caste category person for 5 years in terms of the

advertisement dated 5.2.1011 issued by the Staff Selection

Commission- Respondent no.2 (Annexure-7). Petitioner contends that

as per the said advertisement, which prescribes upper age limit of

18-23 years as on 1.8.2011, category wise r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top