SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
AKIL ANSARI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

B. A. No. 11890 of 2021

…..

Akil Ansari

…… Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

…… Opposite Party

-----

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

-----

For the Petitioner

: Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate

For the State

: Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, A.P.P.

…..

The matter was taken up through Video Conferencing. Learned counsel for the parties had no

objection with it and submitted that the audio and video qualities are good.

…..

03/16.12.2021

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the

State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Ramgarh P. S. Case No.

308 of 2020 registered under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code, however,

charge sheet has been submitted under Sections 366 and 376 of the Indian Penal

Code.

As per the FIR, it has been alleged by the informant that her daughter

Priyanka Sharma, aged about 26 years and who is working in Lala Lajpat Rai,

Vishnu Mandir, Jhanda Chowk, Ramgarh as a Teacher, has been kidnaped for the

purpose of marr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top