SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND - PRINCIPAL BENCH JHARKHAND
SHAHID EQBAL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['ANKIT VISHAL', '', 'ARPAN MISHRA', 'INDRAJIT SINHA', 'AJAY KUMAR SAH', 'SHAILENDRA KUMAR TIWARI']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

A.B.A. No. 7242 of 2021

Shahid Eqbal.

.……Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

….Opposite Party

----

Coram: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY

--------

For the Petitioner

: Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate

For the State

: Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Special P.P.

--------

02/21-1-2022

Heard the parties.

Defect No. 9 (i), as pointed out by the office, is ignored.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Kotalpokhar P.S.

Case No. 78 of 2019, G.R. No. 2644 of 2019.

The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected by this

Court in A.B.A. No. 3370 of 2020 vide order dated 9.9.2020.

It has been submitted by Mr. Indrajit Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner,

that the petitioner was merely the administrator of the WhatSapp Group and from the

FIR it is not clear as to who had posted the supposedly objectionable posts. Mr. Sinha

has referred in support of his contention to an order passed by the Madras High Court

in the case of R. Rajendran Vs. the Inspector of Police, Thanthonimalal, Karur and

A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top