SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(HC) 5077

MOTI MAHTO ALIAS JAIDEO MAHTO – Appellant
Versus
ASHIM KR DEY – Respondent


ORDER

is totally misconceived. Having regard to this position, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed with costs quantified at Rs. 1,000/-.

23. The aforesaid judgments thus reflect that the Commissioner can be appointed not to collect the evidence but to elucidate the matters which are local in character and it can be done only by local investigation at spot, further it may not to allow to appoint at the stage of argument otherwise it will be felt to fill up the lacuna in the evidence.

24. On the basis of this position of law, now the factual aspect involved in this case is appreciated by this Court, wherefrom, it is evident that after closure of witnesses of both the parties, the case was fixed for final argument and after completion of the defendant's argument, the suit was posted for argument on behalf of the plaintiff and thereafter, plaintiffs field a petition under Order XXVI Rule 9 and 10 read with section 151 of the Code for appointment of the commissioner on the basis of evidence as led by the defendant.

25. The Court after hearing both the parties passed the order impugned rejected the prayer for appointment of Commissioner holding that allowing the petition would am


    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top