SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND - PRINCIPAL BENCH JHARKHAND
Sahid Jamal – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Jharkhand And Anr – Respondent


Advocates:
['ASHUTOSH KR SINGH', '', 'MD SUHAIL AKHTAR', 'SIDHANT SINGH', 'APP', '', 'SANJAY KUMAR TIWARI']

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

A.B. A. No.142 of 2016

Sahid Jamal

……

Petitioner

Versus

1.The State of Jharkhand

2. Sarvajeet Kumar

…........Opposite Parties

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH

For the Petitioner :M/s Ashutosh Kr. Singh, Sidhant, Md. Suhail Akhtar, Advocates

For the State :A.P.P.

For the O.P. NO. 2 : Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate

Mr. S. K. Tiwari, Advocate

….....

C.A.V. on: 12/06/2017

Pronounced on: 14/06/2017

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bariatu P.S. Case

No. 416 of 2015, corresponding to G.R. No. 5679 of 2015 for the offence under

sections 419, 420, 467, 474 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case, in short, is that a complaint case bearing Complaint Case

No. 3224 of 2014 was filed by the complainant-Sarwjeet Kumar, which was trasferred

under section 156(3) Cr.P.C and on the bais of which the present Bariatu P.S. Case No.

416 of 2015 has been instituted on 17.07.2010 alleging therein that an agreement for

sale was entered into between the petitiioner-Sahid Jamal and the complainant with

regard to 22 Katha of land appertaining to Khata No. 189, Plot No. 1255 situated at

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top