SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND - PRINCIPAL BENCH JHARKHAND
KHRISTOPHAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['SURAJ VERMA', '', 'KAILASH KUMAR RANJAN', 'RAJESH KUMAR']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Cont. Case (Civil) No. 868 of 2013

Khristophar Singh

....Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand & another

… Opposite Parties

--------

Coram:

THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE P.P. BHATT

--------

For the Petitioner : Mr. Suraj Verma, Advocate

For the Opp. Parties : JC to SC (Mines)

(I.A. No. 704 of 2014)

6 /11.04.2014: Present interlocutory application has been filed seeking

intervention on behalf of the applicant for impleading him as opposite

party in the instant contempt application, who was respondent No.7 in

W.P.(C) No. 4094 of 2013.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and

perused the application.

In view of the reasons stated in the interlocutory

application, same is allowed.

Let intervener/ applicant be impleded as opposite

party No.3.

I.A. No. 704 of 2014 stands disposed of.

( I.A. No. 1072 of 2014)

Present interlocutory application has been filed

seeking intervention on behalf of the applicant for impleading him as

opposite party in the instant contempt application, who was respondent

No.8 in W.P.(C) No. 4094 of 2013.

Heard learned counsel for the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top