LAXMI PAL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ANR – Respondent
-2-
It appears that in connection with Bishunpura P. S. Case No. 30
of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 115 of the
I.P.C. and the provisions of the Arms Act, the Scorpio vehicle bearing
registration no. JH14D/7000 was seized. Subsequently, on the release
application preferred by the owner of the said vehicle, the same was
released in his favour and the petitioner give surety for which certain
conditions were imposed at the time of the release of the vehicle.
Subsequently, an application was preferred by the petitioner that since
the vehicle in question was allegedly purchased by Munna Ansari
much prior to the incident from Deepak Pratap Deo, the petitioner be
permitted to withdraw his surety and be discharged from his liability of
being a bailor. Said application of the petitioner was considered by the
learned court below and vide order dated 23.09.2016, such prayer was
rejected. A further direction was passed with respect to seizure of the
Scorpio vehicle as well as the vehicle belonging to the petitioner so
that he may not make the vehicle disappear in order to frustrate the
order of this court. When admittedly terms and cond
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.