SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

LAXMI PAL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ANR – Respondent


Advocates:
['ASHIM KR SAHANI', '', 'AJIT KUMAR', 'VINAY KUMAR TIWARY']

-2-

It appears that in connection with Bishunpura P. S. Case No. 30

of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 115 of the

I.P.C. and the provisions of the Arms Act, the Scorpio vehicle bearing

registration no. JH14D/7000 was seized. Subsequently, on the release

application preferred by the owner of the said vehicle, the same was

released in his favour and the petitioner give surety for which certain

conditions were imposed at the time of the release of the vehicle.

Subsequently, an application was preferred by the petitioner that since

the vehicle in question was allegedly purchased by Munna Ansari

much prior to the incident from Deepak Pratap Deo, the petitioner be

permitted to withdraw his surety and be discharged from his liability of

being a bailor. Said application of the petitioner was considered by the

learned court below and vide order dated 23.09.2016, such prayer was

rejected. A further direction was passed with respect to seizure of the

Scorpio vehicle as well as the vehicle belonging to the petitioner so

that he may not make the vehicle disappear in order to frustrate the

order of this court. When admittedly terms and cond

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top