SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Abhay Kumar Gupta And Anr – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
['NILESH KUMAR', '', 'NANDAN PRASAD', 'AVISHEK PRASAD', 'ASMITA SHRIVASTAVA', 'KRISHNA SHANKAR']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

A.B.A No. 2741 of 2016

1. Abhay Kumar Gupta

2. Nand Lal Prasad @ Nandalal Prasad

.….. Petitioners

Versus

1.The State of Jharkhand

2.Naseem Alam

….. Opp. Parties.

---------

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH

---------

For the Petitioners

: Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate.

For the State

: Mr. Krishna Shankar,A.P.P.

---------

06/Dated: 13/12/2016

Two petitioners are apprehending their arrest in

connection with O. C. R Case No. 128 of 2015, registered

under Sections 27(C) and 28(A) of Drugs and Cosmetics

Act, 1940, pending in the Court of Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Jamtara.

The brief facts of the case is that the complainant is

filing this complaint in discharge of his duty as a public

servant and as such his initial statement is not necessary

under Section 200 Cr. P. C. On 16.8.2014, the sample of

Neomet oral suspension B.No.-01, Mfg. date 01/2012, Exp.

date 12/2014, Mfg. By-M/s. New Lab Industry, Ramnagar,

Kurthaul, Patna, was collected from Sadar Hospital,

Jamtara in form-17. The sample was sent for the test to

Govt. Analyst, Jharkhand State Drug

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top