SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PRABHASH CHANDRA MAHTO – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['VANDANA SINGH', '', 'RASHMI KUMARI', 'KM POONAM VERMA', 'RAKESH KUMAR SINHA']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Cr. Rev. No. 1289 of 2019

----

Prabhash Chandra Mahto

Petitioner

-versus-

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Ambika Devi

3. Vaishnavi Kumari

Opposite Parties

----

CORAM :

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN

----

For the Petitioner :

Ms. Vandana Singh, Advocate

For the State :

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, A.P.P.

For the O.P. No.2 :

None

----

2/ 20.02.2020

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

A.P.P. for the State.

2.

In this application, the petitioner has challenged the order

dated 11.07.2019 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Bokaro in

Original Maintenance Case No.84 of 2018 by which the maintainance has

been fixed at the rate of Rs.8,000/- (Rupees Eight Thousand) per month.

3.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has got

no fixed income, rather he is astrologer and also performs puja and other

religious rituals. She submits that the amount of maintenance is exorbitant.

She also submits that identity of the lady is also disputed.

4.

Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State, after going through

the impugned order, submits that not only that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top