SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND - PRINCIPAL BENCH JHARKHAND
BASTA SOREN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['MANOJ KR DASH', '', 'NAGMANI TIWARI', 'GOVIND RAY KARAN', 'SURAJ VERMA']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

A.B.A. No.7063 of 2019

------

Basta Soren

....

....

….

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

....

....

.... Opposite Party

------

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

------

For the Petitioner

: Mr. Manoj Kr. Dash, Advocate

For the State

: Mr. Suraj Verma, A.P.P

------

Order No.03 Dated- 21.10.2019

Apprehending his arrest in connection with Complain Case No.58 of 2019

instituted under Sections 33 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 & Bihar Amendment

Act, 1989 (Section 9 of Bihar Amendment Act, 1990) and Section 1 of Sub-Section

3, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.

Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned A.P.P

appearing for the State.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation

against the petitioner is that the petitioner has encroached upon the forest land

and constructed there a mud house. It is submitted that the allegation against

the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top