SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BAIJNATH MAHTO – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER SOUTH CHHOTANAGPUR DIVISION AND ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['AJIT KUMAR', '', 'VIKESH KUMAR', 'G A -III', '', 'PANDEY A N ROY', 'PRAGATI PRASAD', 'MANOJ KR NO']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W.P.(C) No. 5308 of 2013

Baijnath Mahto, son of Lakhia Mahto, resident of Village-

Guchidih, PO & PS: Sonahatu, District- Ranchi

Petitioner

Versus

1. Commissioner, South Chhotanagpur Division, Ranchi, PO:

Ranchi, PS: Kotwali, District- Ranchi

2. Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi, PO: Ranchi, PS: Kotwali,

District- Ranchi

3. Sub-Divisional Officer, Khunti, PO, PS & District- Khunti

4. Raghunath Singh Munda, son of Late Kunjal Singh Munda,

resident of Village- Guchidih, PO & PS: Sonahatu, District-

Ranchi

5. The State of Jharkhand.

Respondents

---

CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY

---

For the Petitioner

: Mr. A. K. Sahani, Advocate

For the Private Respondent : Mr. P. P. N. Roy, Sr. Advocate

Ms. Pragati Prasad, Advocate

For the Respondent- State

: Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate

13/12.12.2018

Heard Mr. A. K. Sahani, counsel appearing on behalf of

the petitioner.

2.

Heard Mr. P. P. N. Roy, Senior counsel appearing on

behalf of the private respondent assisted by Ms. Pragati Prasad,

counsel for the priva

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top