SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Jaideb Hembram And Ors – Appellant
Versus
Nirmal Hembram And Ors – Respondent


Advocates:
['KAUSHIK SARKHEL', '', 'PRASHANT KR RAHUL', 'SUNIL KUMAR DUBEY']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W.P. (C) No. 808 of 2017

---

1.

Jaideb Hembram

2.

Ganesh Hembram

3.

Kanhu Hembram

4.

Mistry Hembram

--- ---- Petitioners

Versus

1.

Nirmal Hembram

2.

Mahim Hembram

3.

Santori Murmu

4.

Kalpana Hembram

--- --- Respondents

---

CORAM:The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh

----

For the Petitioners : Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, Advocate

For the Respondents : Mr. Sunil Kr. Dubey, Advocate

Mr. Manoj Kr. Chaubey, Advocate

----

06/18.04.2017

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

counsel representing the respondent no.2/plaintiff no.3.

Learned court of Civil Judge, Senior Division-II, Jamtara has

by the impugned order dated 9th January 2017 passed in Title Suit

No.23/2005 allowed substitution of the legal heirs of plaintiff no.1 Anil

Hembram being his widow and daughter (respondent nos. 3 and 4

herein).

Brief facts relevant for consideration of the issues in

controversy are referred to herein after. An application was made on 6th

August, 2008 for substitution of the legal heirs of plaintiff no.1 (his widow

and daughter) before the learned court stati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top