SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR
M/S C. R. ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION PVT L – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF JKTHROUGH CHIEF ENGINEER P.D.C – Respondent
AA/9900001/2013



HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT SRINAGAR

M.A No. 144/2013 &

AA No. 9900001/2013

Reserved on: 21.10.2022

Pronounced on: 02.02.2023

State of J&K

M/S C.R.Engineering Construction Pvt. Ltd.

...Appellant(s)

Through:- Mr.M.A.Chashoo, AAG

V/s

M/S C.R.Engineering Construction Pvt. Ltd.

State of J&K

...Respondent(s)

Through:- Mr.Manzoor Ahmad Dar Advocate

With Mr. Javaid Advocate.

Mr. Z.A.Shah Sr. Advocate with

Ms. Humaira Shafi Advocate

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE

JUDGMENT

1.

By this common judgment, two appeals, one filed by the

State of Jammu and Kashmir through Chief Engineer, Power

Development Corporation (M.A No.144/2013) and the other filed by

M/S C.R. Engineering Construction Pvt. Ltd., (AA No.9900001/2013)

against the judgment and decree dated 11.06.2013 passed by the Court

of Additional District Judge, Srinagar (hereinafter referred to as the

„District Court‟), are proposed to be disposed of.

2.

The instant appeals owe their origin to an award dated

31.08.2005 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal that was challenged by

2

both the parties by filing objections thereto before the Court below

where the award was submitted by the Arbitral Tribunal for making it

rule of the Court in terms of the provisions of Jammu and Kashmir

Arbitration Act, Svt. 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the „Old Act‟).

Vide the impugned judgment and decree, the District Court, after

modifying the award passed by the Arbitral Tribunal to a certain

extent, made it rule of the Court.

3

The impugned judgment and decree of the District Court

has been assailed by both the parties by filing instant appeals in terms

of Section 39 of the Old Act. Before coming to the contentions raised

in the appeals, let me give a brief backdrop of the facts leading to filing

of these appeals.

4.

Tenders were invited by the Government of Jammu and

Kashmir for construction of Water Conduction on Sumbal Link

Channels and Power House Construction as per the Tender Notice

No.USHP-II/CE/3 of 1987 dated 30.11.1987. After invitation of the

tenders, the following works under various orders were allotted to M/S

C.R. Engineering Constructions Pvt. Ltd., Vishakhapatnam, Andhra

Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as the „Contractor‟):

S.No.

Name of Contract by

Govt./Chief Engineer

Construction of water

conductor on Sumbal

Link Div.II

Reach No. Value of contract with

No.

and

date

of

Agreement

Date

of

completion

1. 1.Page

No.429

RD 6,690-7,000 m order

USHP II/CE/4 works of

1988 dated 29.02.1988

1st Reach

Rs.46.50

lacs

Agreement 26 of 88

dated 24.03.1988

30.06.1989

3

Page 429

2. 2.Page

429

RD 8,470-9,915 m Under

order No. USHP-II/CE/6-

works of 1988 dated

29.02.1988

2nd Reach

Rs.217.90

lacs

Agreement 24 of 88

dated 24.03.88

Page 429

30.11.89

3. 3.Page

429

RD

10,575-11,250

m

under Order No. USHP-

II/CE/5-works of 1988

dated 29.02.88

3rd Reach

Rs.188.00

lacs

Agreement 25 of 88

dated

24.03.88

Page

429

30.11.89

4. 4.Page

429

RD

12,630-13,125

m

under Order No. USHP-

II/CE/9-works of 1988

dated 29.02.88

6th Reach

Rs.204.75

lacs

Agreement 23 of 88

dated 24.03.88

Page 429

30.11.89

5.

6. 5.page

429

Power House Division

RD

14,000-14,610

m

under Order No. USHP-

II/CE/8-works of 1988

dated 29.02.88

8th Reach

Rs.118.60

lacs

Agreement 6 of 88

dated 24.03.88

Page 429

30.11.89

5.

Subsequently, the contractor was allotted another work of

„Wangath Link‟, namely WLD Rea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top