HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.A. CHOWDHARY,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR
PAHALGAM PEOPLES WELFARE ORGANIZATION – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF J AND K AND OTHERS (PDA) – Respondent
PIL/484/2010
S. No. 07
Regular list
IN THE HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
PIL 484/2010
c/w
CPCR 5/2011
Pahalgam Peoples Welfare Organisation
…Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs.
State of JK and Others
...Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Ilyas Laway, GA
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE MA CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
ORDER
27.12.2022
1. On the last date of hearing there was no representation on behalf of
the petitioner. Today also, when the case was called out nobody
turned up on behalf of the petitioner to represent the petitioner.
2. In this petition the petitioner has essentially challenged the Master
Plan 2005-2025 issued by the Pahalgam Development Authority
on the ground that the same was against the interest of inhabitants
of the area and not in public interest.
3. Mr. Ilyas Laway, learned GA appearing for the respondents
submits that the Master Plan which is impugned in this petition is
no more in vogue and has been replaced by new Master Plan
Pahalgam 2023. In view of the aforesaid, this petition on the face
of it is rendered infructuous and perhaps because of this reason
there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
4. In view of the above, this PIL is closed with a direction to the
respondents to ensure that the construction in the Pahalgam area is
done strictly in accordance with the new Master Plan and steps be
taken by the respondents to remove the illegal encroachments, if
any, by following due process of law. The petitioner shall also be
at liberty to point out individual violations and seek appropriate
remedial measures as may be permissible under law. So far as the
renewal of the expired and subsisting leases are concerned, we are
told that new Rules under the Land Grants Act, 1960 have been
promulgated
and
those
Rules
shall
govern
all
those
matters/structures which were also raised during the course of this
PIL.
5. In view of the closure of the proceedings in the PIL, the contempt
petition as well as other connected CM(s) shall also stand disposed
of.
(MA CHOWDHARY) (SANJEEV KUMAR)
JUDGE
JUDGE
SRINAGAR
27.12.2022
“Mir Arif”