HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
FAREEDA BANOO AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME DEPARTMENT) – Respondent
WP(C) 775/2022
S. No. 74
Supplementary-1
IN THE HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 775/2022
Fareeda Banoo & Anr.
…Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr Z. A. Qureshi, Sr. Advocate with Ms Rehana Fayaz, Adv.
Vs.
Union Territory of JK & Ors.
...Respondent(s)
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE
ORDER
19.04.2022
In this petition, the petitioners essentially seek a direction to the
Director General of Police, to direct the SDPO Police Station, Nehru
Park Srinagar, to appoint a special investigation officer to investigate
the complaint of the petitioners stated to have been filed before the
SDPO Police Station Nehru Park, Srinagar. The grievance of the
petitioners is that there has been trespass on their property by one
Mohammad Kand, S/o Ali Mohammad Kand, R/o Kand Mohalla,
who has unauthorisedly entered the property of the petitioners, after
physically and verbally abusing their mother. The Petitioners claim to
have made a complaint before the SDPO Police Station Nehru Park,
Srinagar. It is the grievance of the petitioner that despite having
approached the concerned police station, no action has been taken.
Having heard Mr Z. A. Qureshi, learned senior counsel
appearing for the petitioner, I am of the view that a code of criminal
procedure takes care of the grievance projected by the petitioner in
this petition.
Needless to say, that if a complaint of facts constituting a
cognizable offence is made to the police station concerned, it is the
bounded duty of the Police to register an FIR and investigate the
matter. Should there be any reluctance on part of the police station
concerned to register an FIR, the remedy of the petitioner lies before
the District Superintendent of Police. If the District Superintendent of
Police also does not intervene in the matter, the person aggrieved is
well within its right to approach the Court under section 156 of CrPC.
The petitioner has not followed the procedure laid down in the code
of criminal procedure and has sought diligence of this Court, for
directing the respondents to virtually to register an FIR, and
investigate the matter.
I am afraid such petition is not maintainable. This petition is,
accordingly, dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioners to take
recourse of the provisions of code of civil procedure for redressal of
their grievance.
(SANJEEV KUMAR)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR
19.04.2022
Hilal Ahmad