S. No.35

Regular List

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT SRINAGAR

CRM(M) No.155/2022

CrlM(M) No.493/2022

Nazir Ahmad Parra & Another

…..Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr.Umar Mir, Advocate

V/s

UT of J&K and Ors

….. Respondent(s)

Through: Mr.Faheem Nisar Shah, GA

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE

ORDER

02.08.2022

1. The petitioners through the medium of instant petition have sought

a direction upon respondent No.2 to register an FIR against the

private respondents alleging that they have been beaten and

molested by the private respondents.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. It is contended in the petition that there is a civil litigation going on

between the petitioners and the private respondents in which an

interim order has been passed by the Sub Judge (Chief Judicial

Magistrate) Budgam. It is alleged that on 18.01.2022, when the

petitioners alongwith their women folk visited the land which is

subject matter of the civil litigation, the private respondents attacked

them with lathies and dandaas. It is further alleged that wife of

petitioner No.1 was given a beating and her clothes were torn.

Besides this some articles were also broken. It is averred that the

SARVEEDA NISSAR

2022.08.08 13:30

I attest to the accuracy and

integrity of this document

2

CRM(M) No.155/2022

petitioners approached with an application to Police Station Magam

with the request to lodge an FIR but no action was taken in the

matter. SSP Budgam was also approached but to no effect.

Eventually the petitioners are stated to have approached the Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Budgam by making an application under

Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C seeking a direction upon SHO, Police

Station, Magam to lodge an FIR. The application of the petitioners

was endorsed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Budgam to the

concerned Police Station for necessary action under law. But no

action was taken by the Police.

4. In the above circumstances, the petitioners have approached this

Court by way of instant petition.

5. Since the petitioners have already approached the Chief Judicial

Magistrate Budgam and a direction has been passed by the said

Court on 15.04.2022, directing the SHO Police Station concerned to

take necessary action as warranted under law, as such, the proper

course for the petitioners would be to approach the said Court by

way of an appropriate application seeking an action against the

official respondents for not having complied with the directions of

the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Budgam.

6. The petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Budgam to ensure implementation of order

dated 15.04.2022 passed by him on the application of petitioners

under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. The petitioners are at liberty to

SARVEEDA NISSAR

2022.08.08 13:30

I attest to the accuracy and

integrity of this document

3

CRM(M) No.155/2022

move a proper application before the Chief Judicial Magistrate

Budgam in this regard.

7. Before parting it would be necessary to comment upon certain facts

that have come to the notice of this Court upon perusal of the record.

It seems that the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Budgam has forwarded

the original application filed by the petitioners under Section 156(3)

of Cr.P.C to the concerned SHO with endorsement that action under

law be taken. The action of forwarding the original application to

the police by the Chief Judicial Magistrate is not in accordance with

the law.

8. This Court in the case of Nasreena Bano vs. State and Ors, 2019(2)

JKJ 135, has clearly emphasized that whenever any application

whether on civil side or criminal side is received by a Court, the

same shall be physically d