SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR - SRINAGAR WING
ABDUL MAJID NAJAR – Appellant
Versus
SATE OF J AND K AND ORS (REVENUE DEPARTMENT) – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S AMIR LATOO AND RAIS YOUSUF', '', 'SHAFQAT NAZIR', 'S M AYOUB', '', 'N H SHAH AAG']

1

S. No. 19

Regular Cause List

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT SRINAGAR

OWP 486/2018

Abdul Majid Najar

…Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr Shafqat Nazir, Advocate.

Vs.

State of J&K and Ors.

...Respondent(s)

Through: Mr F. A. Bhat, AAG

Mr S. M. Ayoub, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE

O R D E R

10.11.2022

1.

In the instant petition petitioner has questioned the order dated

14.12.2011 passed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner

(Commissioner), Pulwama -respondent No. 6 and consequential order

dated 16.08.2017 passed in the revision petition filed by the petitioner

herein as also subsequent order dated 10.03.2018 passed thereto by

the Tehsildar- respondent No. 7 herein.

2.

The facts giving rise to the filing of the instant petition would reveal

that two mutations bearing No. 1007 attested under Section 4 of the

Agrarian Reforms Act, 1976, by respondent No. 7 in favour of the

private respondents in respect of land measuring 7 kanals 4 marlas

covered under survey No. 326 as also mutation No. 1010 attested

under Section 8 of Act, of 1976, in favour of the petitioner. The said

mutations came to be challeng

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top