HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME DEPARTMENT) – Appellant
Versus
MOHAMMAD LATIEF MAGREY AND ANR. (HOME AFFAIRS) – Respondent
LPA 99/2022
['ASIFA PADROO', '', 'D C RAINA', 'AG', 'SAJAD ASHRAF', 'GA', 'T M SHAMSI', 'ASGI', '', 'DEEPIKA SINGH RAJAWAT']
Page 1
LPA no.99/2022
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
….
LPA no.99/2022
Reserved on: 29.06.2022
Pronounced on: 01.07.2022
Union Territory of J&K and others
……...Appellant(s)
Through: Mr D. C. Raina, Advocate General with
Ms Asifa Padroo, AAG and Mr Sajad Ashraf GA
Versus
Mohammad Latief Magrey and another
……...Respondent(s)
Through: Ms Deepika Singh Rajawat, Advocate with
Ms Zarin Ali and Ms Yasmeen Wani, Advocates for
respondent no.1
Mr T. M. Shamsi, ASGI for respondent no.2
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
JUDGEMENT
1. The instant Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgement
dated 27th May 2022, passed in a writ petition, bearing WP(C)
no.11/2022, titled as Mohammad Latief Magrey v. Union of India and
others.
2. The background facts, under the cover of which the instant appeal has
arisen, are that writ petitioner – respondent no.1 herein, instituted the
petition supra praying therein the following relief:
<In view of the submissions made herein above and those to be
urged at the time of hearing, this Hon’ble Court is humbly
Page 2
LPA no.99/2022
requested to direct the respondents to handover the body of Late
Mohammad Amir Magray, who was killed in a joint encounter by
them on 15.11.2021 at Hyderpora area of Budgam in Kashmir to
the petitioner who happens to be his biological father on the facts
and grounds mentioned above.=
The reliefs, as aforesaid, have been sought by writ petitioner/
respondent no.1 herein on the premise that his son, namely, Mohammad
Amir Magray, got killed in an encounter carried by writ-respondents/
appellants herein on 15th November 2021 at Hyderpora, Budgam,
Kashmir, and that the dead body of his deceased son was not handed
over to him by appellants for burial as per religious rites and practices,
thus, resulting into infringement of rights guaranteed under Article 21
of the Constitution of India, in that, the Article 21 extends as well to the
right to have decent burial as per religious ceremonies.
The writ petitioner/respondent no.1 herein had contended in the
petition supra that he has been instrumental in fighting and curbing the
militancy in his native place, i.e., Gool Singaldan, Ramban, along with
Indian Army and in this regard he had cited an incident, in which on 6th
August 2005, he and his wife caught hold a LeT militant, who had
barged into their house and opened indiscriminate firing, thereby killing
his cousin brother, namely, Abdul Qayoom and in the said militant
attack, despite writ he having suffered injuries, hit the said militant with
a stone, and his deceased son and wife snatched a rifle from the said
militant after the militant had lost his conscious owing to the hit
suffered by the said stone. Writ petitioner/ respondent no.1 is stated to
have been conferred with the State Award for Bravery for the said
incident by the then Government of Jammu and Kashmir in the year
Page 3
LPA no.99/2022
2012. Respondent no.1 even was stated to have been well appreciated
by the Indian Army and for the services rendered by him in eradicating
the militancy in his native area, Gool Sangaldan, Ramban.
It had also been stated in the petition by respondent no.1 that his
whole family, including deceased son, had been associated in fight
against militancy in the area. It had been further stated in petition that
owing to financial constraints, the deceased son of respondent no.1
could not continue to pursue his studies and, as such, in order to support
the family, shifted to sister’s house in Kashmir and got a job of helper
in the office of one, Dr. Mudasir. During this period, the respondent
no.1 was stated to have remained in constant touch with deceased son,
who used to work with the said Dr. Mudasir till 14th November 2021.
It had been next stated in the petition by respondent no.1 that on
16th Novemb