HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL
GHULAM MOHAMMAD MIR AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
STATION HOUSE OFFICER POLICE STATION KUPWARA AND ANR. (HOME DEPARTMENT) – Respondent
CRM(M)/209/2021
Serial No. 86
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M) No. 209/2021
Ghulam Mohammad Mir and Others
Petitioner(s)/ Appellant(s)
Through: -
Mr Sheikh Manzoor, Advocate.
V/s
SHO Police Station Kupwara and Another
…..Respondent(s)
Through: -
Mr Sajad Ashraf, Dy.AG for R 1.
Mr M. A. Wani, Advocate for R 2.
CORAM:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul, Judge.
ORDER
21.08.2021
1.
Petitioners feeling aggrieved of registration of FIR No. 358/2020
(herein after for short “FIR”) at Police Station Kupwara for
commission of offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 &
471 and investigation thereon and as such, have filed this petition
seeking quashment thereof in exercise of powers under Section 482
CrPC on the ground that petitioners have retired from revenue service
since long and are presently old aged suffering from various ailments.
2.
It is stated that FIR has been registered on a complaint of respondent
No. 2, alleging that Naib Tehsildar, Mohammad Iqbal Malik, in
connivance of with his relatives fraudulently mutated the land falling
under Khasra No. 1298/1108 in his favour. On the basis of said
complaint Crime Branch, Kashmir, conducted an enquiry and
thereafter approved registration of FIR in question.
3.
It is next stated that petitioners have been implicated in the FIR on the
ground that mutation had been attested in the year 1998 when they
were discharging their duties as revenue officers in village Tiker. It is
further stated that the said mutation had been attested in accordance
with standing orders regarding attestation of mutation and on the face
of evidence/witnesses recorded.
4.
It is next stated that FIR relates to an occurrence of 1998 when
mutation in respect of 01 kanal and 05 marlas was attested and in
respect of said property, parties had been litigating in different courts
and have finally settled the dispute.
5.
It is further stated that the dispute between the parties is purely of a
civil nature and said registration of FIR is nothing but to harass the
petitioners. Petitioners claim that they have not committed any
offence and attestation of mutation has been done after following due
procedure of law.
6.
Respondents have filed status report wherein it is stated that Abdul
Rashid Malik S/o Sonaullah Malik R/o Tikker Kupwara has filed a
written complaint before the Crime Branch, Kashmir. Upon receipt of
the same, enquiry was conducted and FIR registered to the effect that
Naib Tehsildar, Mohamamd Iqbal Mir S/o Abdul Aziz Mir, and
Mohammad Iqbal Malik S/o Sunaullah Malik and his brother Naseer
Ahmad Malik have got fraudulently mutated the land falling under
Khasra No. 1108 which was earlier mutated in the name of
grandfather of Abdul Rashid Malik. It is reported that upon
registration of FIR, investigation was set into motion. During
investigation it came to fore that the land measuring 01 kanal and 05
marlas falling under Khasra no. 1108 belong to grandfather of Abdul
Rashid Malik and same got mutated by Mohammad Sultan Malik
who had passed away on 29.01.1984 in the name of his own sons. It is
claimed that the accused persons, in greed with fraudulent intention,
had mutated the land belong to Sunah Malik S/o Jabbar Malik in the
name of Sunnah Malik, Lassi Malik and Gani Malik. Now Sunnah
Malik and Gani Malik have passed away and land is in possession of
Mohammad Iqbal Malik S/o Sunnah Malik. It is further stated that
upon evidence collected accused persons have been found involved in
the commission of offences. It is further stated that investigation is in
progress and has not been completed.
7.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and considered the matter.
8.
As per the status report, on a written complaint filed by one Abdul
Rashid Malik, Crime Branch initiated enquiry and registered FIR No.
358/2020 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 420,
467,