SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR - SRINAGAR WING
ASHIQ RASOOL TANTRAY AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
ZAHIDA BEIGUM – Respondent


S. No. 57

Before Notice Matters

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU &KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT SRINAGAR

CRM(M) No. 347/2022

CrlM No. 1017/2022

Ashiq Rasool Tantray and anr.

…..Petitioner(s)

Through:

Mr. S. S. Rizvi, Adv.

V/s

Zahida Begum

….. Respondent(s)

Through:

CORAM:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar, Judge.

ORDER

23.08.2022

The petitioner has invoked jurisdiction of this court under Section 482 of

the Cr. PC challenging order dated 24.12.2021 passed by the Judicial Magistrate

1st Class, Kangan whereby the learned Magistrate, while disposing of the petition

of the respondent under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic

Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter called as DV Act) directed the petitioner to pay a

monthly compensation of Rs. 3000/- per month to his wife/respondent herein.

It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the

impugned order passed by the learned Magistrate is without jurisdiction inasmuch

as the respondent was residing at Ganderbal which is located outside the local

limits of the j

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top