HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AIJAZ AHMAD MIR – Appellant
Versus
UT OF J AND K AND ORS HOME(State Government) – Respondent
WP(Crl) 618/2019
['HUSSIAN RASHID', '', 'HUSSAIN RASHID', 'B A TAK', 'ASIF MAQBOOL']
S.No.241
Supplimentary 1
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
WP(Crl) No. 618/2019
Aijaz Ahmad Mir.
…Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Hussain Rashid, advocate.
V/s
Union Territory of JK and Others.
…Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Asif Maqbool, GA vice
Ms. Asifa Padroo, AAG.
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE.
ORDER
16.11.2021
1. In this petition, the petitioner has called in question his detention
through his brother Mohammad Shafi Mir, ordered by a district
Magistrate,
Baramulla,
vide
detention
order
no.79/DMB/PSA/2019 dated 30.10.2019.
2. From the perusal of the order impugned, it is clear that the
petitioner was detained under Public Safety Act, with a view of
preventing him from acting in any manner, prejudicial to the
security of the State. The impugned order has been challenged by
the petitioner on a variety of grounds.
3. In response, the detaining authority has filed reply affidavit in
which the detention of the petitioner has been sought to be
justified on the ground of his persistent engagement in the
activities, prejudicial to the security of the State. From the reading
of the reply affidavit, it also comes out that pursuant to the
impugned order of detention, the detenue was detained on
02.11.2019, itself and was lodged in district jail, Srinagar.
4. If that be the position, the petitioner has already undergone
maximum period of detention i.e. two years prescribed under
Jammu & Kashmir Public Safety Act, the order impugned has
thus, outlived its life and therefore, this petition has been rendered
infructuous and the same is accordingly, disposed of as such.
5. The respondents shall release the petitioner from preventive
custody forthwith, if not already released.
(SANJEEV KUMAR)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR
16 .11.2021
Shaista