SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR - SRINAGAR WING
ABDUL RASHID GANAIE – Appellant
Versus
GHULAM RASOOL SHEIKH – Respondent


CM(M) No.72/2019, CM No.8071/2019

1

Sr. No.203

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

AT SRINAGAR

CJ Court

CM(M) No.72/2019, CM No.8071/2019

Abdul Rashid Ganaie

…Petitioner(s)/Appellants.

Through:

Mr. G. Q. Bhat, Advocate.

Vs.

Ghulam Rasool Sheikh

….Respondent(s)

Through:

Mr. Usman Gani, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

O R D E R

02.04.2021

01.

Learned counsel for the parties agree for final disposal of the matter.

02.

Heard Sh. G. Q. Bhat, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sh. Usman

Gani, learned counsel for the respondent.

03.

The petitioner has invoked the supervisory jurisdiction of this court

under Article 227 of the Constitution of India so as to assail the condition

imposed while granting leave to defend the suit filed under Order 37 Rule 3(5)

CPC, vide order dated 16.12.2019.

04.

The impugned order dated 16.12.2019 states that although the defence

urged by the defendant/ petitioner seems to be illusory and sham yet the right to

defend the suit is granted subject to the condition he deposits an amount of

Rs.6.45 lakhs in the court which later on was converted into furnishing ba

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top