SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

FAYAZ AHMAD SHAH AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF J&K THROUGH P/S ANANTNAG (HOME) – Respondent


Advocates:
['S T HUSSAIN', '', 'SHABIR AHMAD', 'M A QAYOOM', 'NADIYA', 'MASOODA', 'S GOWHAR', '', 'SAJAD A MIR', 'SHUJA UL HAQ']

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

AT SRINAGAR

Reserved on: 08.03.2021

Pronounced on: 04.06.2021

Case: CRA No. 01/2015

c/w Bail App No. 101/2019

Mohammad Maqbool Lone

…Applicant/Appellant(s)

Through: Mr. M. M. Khan, Advocate

v/s

Intelligence Officer Narcotics

…. Respondent(s)

Through: Sh. T. M. Shamsi, ASGI

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE

JUDGMENT

Per Oswal-J

1.

The appellant, after having been convicted by court of learned Sessions

Judge Kathua (hereinafter to be referred as trial court) for commission of

offence under section 8(c) of the NDPS Act read with sections

20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act (for short the Act) and sentenced to

undergo rigorous imprisonment for 20 years and payment of fine of Rs. 2

lacs, has challenged the judgment dated 08.01.2015 (hereinafter to be

referred as the judgment impugned) and order dated 10.01.2015 through

the medium of present appeal on the various grounds legal as well as

factual, as narrated in the memo of ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top