SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MUNEERA BEGUM AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH SHO SURANKOTE – Respondent


S. No. 105

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

AT JAMMU

Bail App No. 16/2021 (O&M)

Reserved on: 06.04.2021

Pronounced on: 12.04.2021

Muneera Begum and others

...Applicant/Petitioner(s)

Through :- Mr. A. K. Sawhney, Advocate

v/s

<

UT of J&K and another

.....Respondent(s)

't

Through :- Mr. Adarsh Bhagat, GA for R-1

Mr. Sunil Sethi, Sr. Advocate with

Mr. Lawanya Sharma, Advocate for R-2.

Coram:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE

ORDER

1.

The petitioners, through the medium of the instant bail application,

are seeking bail in anticipation of their arrest in case FIR No. 0002/2021 for

offences under Sections 307, 341, 147, 148 & 149 of IPC and 4 & 25 of Arms

Act registered with Police Station, Surankote, District, Poonch.

2.

The facts giving rise to the filing of instant bail application are that

the complainant, namely, Mir Mohammad lodged a written report to Police

Station, Surankote to the effect that the petitioners are having a long standing

dispute with the complainant party over a piece of land and that with a criminal

intention to kill the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top