HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
KARANJEET KOUR AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH HOME DEPTT AND ORS – Respondent
CRM(M) 18/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
AT JAMMU
CRM(M) 18/2021
CrlM Nos. 70/2021,
363/2021
Karanjeet Kour and ors
... Petitioner(s)
Through: -Mr.M. Tariq Mughal Advocate.
Vs.
Union Territory J&K and another
Respondent(s)
Through: - Mr. Aseem Sawhney AAG
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
JUDGMENT
1
The instant petition came to be filed by the petitioners seeking
quashment of FIR No. 09/2017 dated 01.03.2017 for offences under
Sections 498-A/406/109 RPC registered with Police Station, Women
Cell, Gandhi Nagar,Jammu together with the challan pending disposal
before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class (City Judge),
Jammu and the consequent proceedings initiated thereon by the learned
Magistrate, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.
2
It is the case of the petitioners that petitioner No. 1 and petitioner
No.2 are legally wedded couple, whereas, petitioners No. 3 & 4
happen to be the parents of petitioner No.2, petitioner No.5 happens to
be the brother of petitioner No.2, petitioners No.6 and 7 happens to be
the maternal grandfather and grandmother of petitioner No.2 and
petitioner No.8 happens to be the maternal uncle of petitioner No.2.
2
According to the petitioners, after the solemnization of their marriage,
relations between them got strained. This led to their separation giving
rise to filing of a complaint under Section 12 of the Protection of
Woman from Domestic Violence Act before the Court of learned
JMIC/ City Judge, Jammu. During the pendency of the said complaint,
petitioner No.1 also lodged FIR No. 09/2017 with the Police Station,
Women Cell, Jammu against the other petitioners which led to the
filing of the challan before the trial Court.
3.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
record.
4
It appears that, during the pendency of aforesaid litigation, good
sense prevailed upon the parties and they settled their disputes. In this
direction, they filed a petition for grant of divorce by mutual consent
before the Court of learned Additional District Judge (Matrimonial
Cases), Jammu. It is pertinent to mention here that during the pendency
of said petition, a compromise deed had also been executed between
the parties on 24.11.2020, copy whereof has been placed on record by
the petitioners. As per the terms of the said compromise deed, it has
been agreed by both the parties that they will not file any litigation in
future against each other and that they have amicably decided not to
pursue the criminal cases filed against each other in Police
Stations/Courts concerned which included the impugned FIR.
5
It appears that the learned Additional District Judge
(Matrimonial Cases), Jammu, after recording the statements of the
3
parties wherein the parties have stated that there is nothing outstanding
against each other, dissolved the marriage of petitioners Nos.1 and 2
by passing a decree of divorce by mutual consent under Section 13-B
of the Hindu Marriage Act. It is submitted that in view of the
compromise arrived at between the parties and the mutual divorce
between the parties, complaint under Section 12 of Protection of
Woman from Domestic Violence Act pending disposal before the Court
of learned JMIC/City Judge, Jammu has also been dismissed as
withdrawn vide order dated 09.01.2021
6 This Court, vide order dated 17.02.2021, directed the parties to
appear before the Registrar Judicial of this Court for recording their
statements in support of the compromise arrived at between them,
whereafter their statements were recorded by the learned Registrar
Judicial wherein petitioners Nos.1 and 2 have stated that they have
entered into a compromise and have amicably settled all their disputes
and issues.
7
Referring to the aforesaid settlement, it is submitted by the
petitioners that all the dispu