SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

STATE – Appellant
Versus
JAVED IQBAL AND ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['A H QAZI AAG', '', 'ADARSH BHAGAT', 'GA', 'ASHISH SINGH KOTWAL', 'DY AG', 'KHALID KHATAK', '', 'K M BHATTI']

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

AT JAMMU

CRAA No. 26/2007

Reserved on:- 15.03.2021

Pronounced on:-24.03.2021

State of J&K.

.....Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)

Through :- Mr. Adarsh Bhagat, GA.

V/s

Javed Iqbal and others.

.....Respondent(s)

Through :-

Mr. K.M. Bhatti, Advocate for R-1.

None for respondents Nos. 2 & 3.

CORAM :

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE

JUDGMENT

Sanjay Dhar-J

1.

The instant appeal is directed against the judgment dated

18.09.2006 passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Poonch, whereby

accused/respondent No.1, namely, Javed Iqbal has been acquitted of the

charges for offences under Sections 302, 307, 429, 436, 147, 148, 149 and 120-

B RPC read with Sections 7/25, 26 and 27 of the Arms Act.

2.

Briefly stated the case of the prosecution before the Trial Court

was that the complainant, namely, Khalid Mehmood lodged a report with the

Police Station, Surankote, alleging therein that during the intervening night of

28th and 29th June, 1999, 15-20 persons entered his house located at Mohra

Bachai, Surankote. The said persons after con

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top