HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
VIJAY KUMAR PANDIT AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE TH.P.D.D.AND ORS – Respondent
SWP 1764/2015
SWP No. 1764/2015
MP No. 01/2017
Page 1 of 2
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
AT JAMMU
SWP No. 1764/2015
MP No. 01/2017
Date of order: 15.11.2017
Vijay Kumar Pandit & anr. vs. State and ors.
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr Justice Alok Aradhe, Judge
Appearing counsel:
For Petitioner/appellant(s) :
Mr. M K Raina, Advocate
For respondent (s)
:
Mr. Ehsan Mirza, Dy.AG
i/
Whether to be reported in
Yes/No
Press/Media?
ii/
Whether to be reported in
Yes/No
Digest/Journal?
With consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally.
In this writ petition, the petitioners inter alia seek a writ of certiorari
seeking quashment of orders dated 20.03.2015 and 30.03.2015, by which the
claims of the petitioners have been rejected by respondent No.4 and the
petitioners have not been extended the benefit of SRO 149 of 1973.
When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioners
submitted that the controversy involved in the instant petition is squarely covered
by the orders passed in SWP No.1341/1999 dated 27.07.2001 and SWP
No.691/2002 dated 22.02.2007. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted
that the writ petition be disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to
consider the claims of the petitioners for grant of benefit of SRO 149 of 1973 as
provided under Government Order No.134-PDD of 2001 dated 03.04.2001 and in
terms of orders passed by this Court in SWP No.1341/1999 dated 27.07.2001 and
SWP No. 1764/2015
MP No. 01/2017
Page 2 of 2
SWP No.691/2002 dated 22.02.2007 without being influenced by the orders dated
20.03.2015 and 30.03.2015.
On the other hand, learned Dy.AG submits that suitable action with regard
to claims of the petitioners shall be taken in accordance with law.
In view of the aforesaid submissions and in the facts of the case, the writ
petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to consider the
cases of the petitioners in the light of the orders passed in SWP No.1341/1999
dated 27.07.2001 and SWP No.691/2002 dated 22.02.2007 by a speaking order
without being influenced by the orders dated 20.03.2015 and 30.03.2015, within a
period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order
passed today. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on
merits of the case.
With the aforesaid direction, the petition is disposed of along with
connected MP.
(Alok Aradhe)
Judge
Jammu
15.11.2017
Raj Kumar