HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
PARSHOTAM KUMAR AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE TH.P.H.E.DEPTT.AND ORS – Respondent
SWP 454/2019
Item No. 37
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
ATJAMMU
SWP No. 454/2019
[WP(C) No. 841/2019]
CM(3571/2019)
CM(1870/2019[01/2019])
Parshotam Kumar and ors.
.....Petitioner(s)
Through:- Petitioner Nos. 3 to 7 are present in
person.
V/s
State th. PHE Deptt and ors.
......Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. Rajesh Thappa, Dy. AG vice
Mr. K. D. S. Kotwal, Dy. AG
Mr. Vishal Sharma, ASGI
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE
ORDER
1.
Petitioner Nos. 3 to 7, who are present in person, submit that this
Court has already decided the identical matters and pray for disposal
of the present case with the same directions and lines.
2.
Statments of the petitioners are taken on record.
3.
The petitioners submit that their case for grant of pension was under
process. However, the same has been sent back from the office of the
Accountant General to the State-respondents. It is submitted that the
respondents are ignoring the mandate contained in Regulation 242 of
the Civil Service Regulations (CSR). It is further stated that the
petitioners will feel satisfied in case while processing their case, the
aforementioned regulation would be considered by the respondents.
2 SWP No. 454/2019
4.
The petitioners have also produced the judgments/orders passed by
this Court in SWP Nos. 2598/2018, 2387/2018 and WP(C)
No. 3868/2019.
5.
Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the
respondents, particularly respondent No. 5 to consider the claim of
petitioners for settlement of their pension cases under rule, within a
period of two weeks from the date a certified copy of this order and
copies of judgments referred herein above is made available to him
by the petitioners against proper receipt. While considering the claim,
respondent No. 5 shall take note of the recommendations made by
respondents 1 to 4 as also the judgment rendered in SWP
No. 2387/2018 provided the petitioners are similarly situated with the
writ petitioners of the aforesaid petition.
6.
Disposed of.
(Tashi Rabstan)
Judge
JAMMU
04.12.2019
MEENAKSHI
MEENAKSHI DEVI
2019.12.07 12:45
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document