SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MOHAMMAD BASIM MALIK – Appellant
Versus
ABDUL HAMEED DAR – Respondent


CRTA No.30/2017 Page 1 of 5

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

AT JAMMU

CRTA No.30/2017 & IA No.01/2017

Date of order: 28.09.2018

Mohammad Basim Malik Vs. Abdul Hameed Dar

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Gupta

Appearing counsel:

For the Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Anil Sethi, Advocate

For the Respondent(s):

Mr. Sarfraz Shah, Advocate

i) Whether to be reported in

Digest/Journal

:

Yes/No.

ii)

Whether approved for reporting

in Press/Media

:

Yes/No.

1.

Through the instant petition, petitioner seeks transfer

of

the

proceedings in the shape of criminal complaint titled Abdul Hameed

Dar vs. Mohammad Basim Malik under Section 138 Negotiable

Instrument Act read with Section 420 RPC from the Court of Judicial

Magistrate 1st Class Charar-i-Sharief to any competent Court of

jurisdiction at Jammu.

2.

The petitioner claims to have been served with a notice from the

Court of Mu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top