SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUDESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA TH MINISTRY OF DEFENSE AND ORS – Respondent


Sr. No. 102

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

AT JAMMU

CJ Court

Case: WP (C ) No. 1424 of 2020

(Through Video Conferencing)

Sudesh Kumar

…Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr. O.P.Thakur, Sr. Advocate with

Mr. R.K.S.Thakur, Advocate

v/s

Union of India and Others

…. Respondent(s)

Through: Mr. Vishal Sharma, ASGI

CORAM:

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE

ORDER

1.

Heard Shri O.P.Thakur, Senior counsel assisted by Shri

R.K.S.Thakur learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Vishal Sharma,

learned Assistant Solicitor General of India for the respondents.

2.

The petitioner has preferred this writ petition challenging the

Judgment and order dated 02.05.2019 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal

Regional Bench Srinagar, at Jammu in T.A. 42/2017 (Previously SWP No.

1144/2011) rejecting the Bail Application of the petitioner.

3.

Shri Vishal Sharma, at the very outset took a preliminary

objection that the petitioner has a statutory remedy of appeal against the

aforesaid order and therefore t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top