SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PRITISH MAHAJAN AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
UT OF J AND K TH SHO PS WOMEN CELL GANDHI NAGAR AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
['HIMANSHU BEOTRA', '', 'ROHAN K SHARMA', 'ASEEM SAWHNEY AAG']

1

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

CRM(M) No. 647/2021

Pritish Mahajan and ors.

…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr. Rohan Kidar Sharma, Advocate vice

Mr. Himanshu Beotra, Advocate.

Vs

UT of J&K and Anr.

.…. Respondent(s)

Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, AAG.

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE

ORDER

15.03.2022

1.

Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C (previously Section

561-A Cr.P.C) is being invoked by the petitioners for quashment of FIR

No. 05/2019 dated 23.02.2019, registered with Police Station, Women Cell,

Jammu by the respondent No. 1 at the instance of respondent No. 2 against the

petitioners for commission of offences under Sections 498-A, 109, 504 and 506

RPC and challan bearing No. 04/2019 titled as, <State Vs. Pritish Mahajan=,

pending before the Court of Electricity Magistrate (Sub-Judge), Jammu against

the petitioners in lieu of amicable settlement arrived at between the parties.

2.

The parties are stated to have entered into a compromise and settled

their disputes and differences, whereunder the impugned FIR had got registered

at the instance of responde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top