HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR - JAMMU WING
VIJAY SAJGOTRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE TH.LAW DEPTT.AND ORS – Respondent
OWP No. 1447/2010
Page 1 of 2
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
AT JAMMU
OWP No. 1447/2010
Date of order: 13.11.2017
Vijay Sajgotra
Vs
State of J&K and others
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Gupta, Judge
Appearance:
For the petitioner (s) : Mr. Narinder Kr. Attri, Advocate.
For the respondent(s) : Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG.
(Oral)
1.
The only grievance put forth by the learned counsel for the petitioner is
that being an enrolled Advocate he was appointed as a Standing Counsel
for J&K Cements Ltd. by the Government vide order dated LD(A)97/10
dated 25.11.1997 on a monthly retainership of Rs.1500/-. Consequently,
vide Govt. Order No. 2485-LD(A) of 2003 dated 17.09.2003 the monthly
retainership has been enhanced from Rs. 1500/- to Rs. 3000/- and
payment of counsel fee @ Rs. 2000/- per case with miscellaneous
expenses of Rs.1000/-, but instead of giving payment to the petitioner
according to the new fee structure, the respondents gave retainership @
Rs. 1500 per month, as per the old fee structure with effect from
17.09.2003 till 12.01.2008.
2.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.