HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
ABDUL AZIZ – Appellant
Versus
STATE TH. INFORMATION DEPTT.AND ORS – Respondent
SWP 2547/2013
SWP No.2547/2013, MP No.3736/2013
Page 1 of 2
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
SWP No.2547/2013, MP No.3736/2013
Date of order:25.04.2018
Abdul Aziz
Vs.
State and Ors.
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe, Judge
Appearing counsel:
For Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. Rahul Pant, Advocate.
For respondent (s)
: Mr. Venus Gupta, Deputy AG.
The petition is admitted for hearing. With consent of the learned counsel
for the parties, the matter is heard finally.
In this petition, the petitioner inter alia seeks writ of mandamus
commanding the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner on the
post of Orderly in accordance with the J&K Daily Rated/ Work Charge
Employees Regularization Rules, 1994 with effect from the date the petitioner has
completed seven years of service with all consequential benefits. Alternatively,
the petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to
regularize and appoint the services of the petitioner on the regular pay scale of
Orderly strictly in accordance with the Government Order No.1285-GAD of 2001
dated 06.11.2001, and to grant him all consequential benefits including arrears of
salary.
Facts giving rise to the filing of this writ petition briefly stated are that the
petitioner belongs to the Scheduled Tribe category. The petitioner was engaged as
Orderly in Tehsil Information Centre, Budhal vide order dated 29.07.1993. The
engagement of the petitioner was on ad hoc basis which was continued from time
to time and the petitioner continued to perform the duties on the post of Orderly in
Tehsil Information Centre, Budhal. It is the case of the petitioner that since 1993,
he has been regularly performing the duties on the post of Orderly and the Deputy
Commissioner, Rajouri by an order dated 31.01.1995 has directed continuation of
SWP No.2547/2013, MP No.3736/2013
Page 2 of 2
the services of the petitioner. However, the respondents by an order dated
26.07.2012 regularized the services of the petitioner with prospective effect. In
the aforesaid factual background, the petitioner has approached this Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioner while inviting the attention of this Court
to Government Order No.1285-GAD of 2001 dated 06.11.2001, submitted that the
Government has taken a decision to regularize the services of all ad hoc
appointees, who have been recruited from time to time beyond 29.12.1998 subject
to terms and conditions mentioned therein. It is further submitted that the
petitioner fulfils all the conditions mentioned therein and, therefore, he is entitled
to the benefit of the aforesaid order and the respondents are, therefore, under an
obligation to confer the benefit of the aforesaid order on the petitioner and to
regularize his services from the date when he has completed seven years of
service. On the other hand, learned Deputy Advocate General submits that
suitable action in accordance with law shall be taken.
From perusal of the pleadings of the parties and from the facts of the case,
it is evident that the petitioner is performing the duties on the post of the Orderly
since 29.07.1993 uninterruptedly and he is entitled to the benefit of the
Government Order No.1285-GAD of 2001 dated 06.11.2001. Accordingly, it is
directed that the competent authority-respondent Nos.1 and 2 shall take a decision
with regard to regularization of the petitioner on the post of Orderly with
retrospective effect in the light of the Government Order No.1285-GAD of 2001
dated 06.11.2001 by a speaking order within a period of two months from today.
Needless to state that in case, the petitioner is found entitled to the benefit of the
aforesaid order, all consequential benefits shall be accorded to him.
With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of along
with connected MP.
(Alok Aradhe)
Judge