HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
IRTIZA MUSHTAQ – Appellant
Versus
STATE TH.GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPTT.AND ORS – Respondent
PIL 33/2017
['S S AHMED', 'SEEMA SHEKHER', 'SR AAG', '', 'K K JANDIAL', 'S K ANAND', 'ABHINAV SHARMA', 'RATISH MAHAJAN', 'AJAY BAKSHI', 'PRIYANSHU SHARMA', 'SACHIN GUPTA', 'ADARSH SHARMA', 'SACHIN SHARMA', 'R K GUPTA', 'SR ADV', 'S S NANDA SR AAG', 'U K JALALI SR ADV']
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
AT JAMMU
Reserved on: 06.04.2021
Pronounced on: 28.04.2021
CJ Court
Case: PIL No. 33 of 2017
(through video conferencing)
Irtiza Mushtaq
…Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: Sh. S. S. Ahmed, Advocate
and Ms. Supriya Chouhan,
Advocate
v/s
State of J&K and others
…. Respondent(s)
Through: Sh. S. S. Nanda, Sr. AAG for
respondent No. 2
Sh. Sachin Gupta, Advocate for
respondent No. 3
Sh. Abhinav Sharma, Sr. Advocate
with Ms. Parkhi Parihar, Advocate
for respondent No. 5
Sh. R. K. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with
Sh. Ratish Mahajan, Advocate for
respondent Nos. 6 and 7
Sh. K. K. Jandiyal, Advocate for
respondent No. 8
Sh. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate for
respondent Nos. 9 and 10
Sh. Ajay Bakshi, Advocate for
respondent No.11
Sh. U. K. Jalali, Sr. Advocate with
Ms. Poonam Kaul, Advocate for
respondent No.12
Sh. S. K. Anand, Advocate for
respondent No.13.
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
1.
The petitioner, a practicing lawyer of this Court claiming to be a
Right to Information (RTI) activist as well, has filed the present petition in public
interest, wherein a challenge has been thrown to the allotments made by the
2
PIL No. 33 of 2017
respondent No. 3 in favour of respondent Nos. 5 to 13 by virtue of various
allotment orders spanning from the year 1993 till 2015 and simultaneously, the
petitioner has prayed for the eviction of the private respondents from the
Municipals Flats situated at Gandhi Nagar Jammu and also for recovery of rent at
the market value from the respondent Nos. 5 to 13. Yet another prayer has been
made to direct State Vigilance Organization (Now Anti Corruption Bureau) to
register an FIR under section 5(2) of the Jammu and Kashmir Prevention of
Corruption Act.
2.
It is stated that the Jammu Municipal Corporation has adopted a pick
and choose policy for the purpose of allotment of Municipal Flats/Quarters
located at posh locality of Gandhi Nagar Jammu in favour of its officers who had
served its senior positions and later superannuated and the allotments have been
extended for a further period of 40 years at a meager rent of Rs. 600/- to Rs. 900/-
per month. It is also the case of the petitioner that the Municipal Corporation has
allotted the Municipal Flats/Quarters at Gandhi Nagar, Jammu to some private
persons as well at a meager rent arbitrarily just on the basis of pick and choose
policy without adopting any rational criteria. The petitioner claims to have
obtained an information under RTI Act, regarding the allotments made by the
Jammu Municipal Corporation.
3.
The following instances of illegal allotments have been narrated by
the petitioner.
(a)
That vide order No. ME/Estt/6466-67 dated 08.10.1993, a Municipal
Flat at Gandhi Nagar, Jammu was allotted in favour of respondent
No. 5 and the order was issued without mentioning the status of the
beneficiary who at that point of time was a senior KAS Officer and
3
PIL No. 33 of 2017
later respondent No. 5 has remained as Municipal Commissioner,
Jammu and also served as Commissioner/Secretary to Government
of Jammu and Kashmir, Housing and Urban Development
Department. As per the Rent Deed dated 20.12.2012, the lease of the
aforesaid Municipal Flat has been executed for a term of 40 years
with effect from 20.12.2012 at a monthly rent of Rs. 1000/- only
with escalation of rent by at least 15% for a further period of 2 years.
It is further stated that the said IAS Officer has succeeded in
inducting his nephew, namely, Rahul Gupta S/o Sh. K. L. Gupta as
one of the beneficiaries of the above m