HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
AMBEDKAR YUVAKA SANGHA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP/1863/2008
1
W.P.No.1863/2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF APRIL, 2018
PRESENT
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.1863/2008 (LB-RES) PIL
BETWEEN :
1.
AMBEDKAR YUVAKA SANGHA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
MANJUNATHA
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
S/O HANUMANTHA RAJU
@ RAMAKRISHNAPPA
HAMPAPURA VILLAGE
H.D.KOTE TALUK
MYSURU DISTRICT
2.
RAKESH @ BASAVARAJU
S/O LATE CHAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
HAMPAPURA VILLAGE
H.D.KOTE TALUK
MYSURU DISTRICT
3.
DEVARAJU
S/O LATE ANKAIAH
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
HAMPAPURA VILLAGE
H.D.KOTE TALUK
MYSURU DISTRICT
2
W.P.No.1863/2008
4.
SIDDARAJU S/O SUBBAIAH
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
HAMPAPURA VILLAGE
H.D.KOTE TALUK
MYSURU DISTRICT
... PETITIONERS
(By Sri P MAHESHA, ADV.,)
AND :
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS SECRETARY
RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND
PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT
M.S.BUILDINGS
BENGALURU-560 001
2.
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
MYSORE ZILLA PANCHAYATH
MYSURU
3.
THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER
TALUK PANCHAYATH
H.D.KOTE TALUK
MYSURU DISTRICT
4.
THE SECRETARY
GRAM PANCHAYATH
HAMPAPURA VILLAGE
H.D.KOTE TALUK,
MYSURU DISTRICT
5.
PARVATHAMMA
D/O MARISWAMAIAH
MARRIED
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
SRIRAMPURA VILLAGE
MYSURU TALUK
3
W.P.No.1863/2008
6.
H C VEERABHADRAPPA
S/O. H.S. CHENNEGOWDA
SINCE DECEASED BY LR’S
6(a) RAVI H.V.
S/O LATE H C VEERABHADRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
HAMPAPURA VILLAGE & POST,
H.D.KOTE TALUK
MYSURU DISTRICT.
6(b) NAVEEN H.V.
S/O LATE H C VEERABHADRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
HAMPAPURA VILLAGE & POST,
H.D.KOTE TALUK
MYSURU DISTRICT.
6(c) SMT. RAJINI H.V.
D/O LATE H C VEERABHADRAPPA
W/O. SRI LOTHITH
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
DEVARASANAHALLY VILLAGE AND POST,
NANJANGUD TALUK,
MYSURU DISTRICT.
7.
GANGADHARAIAH
S/O MARISHWAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
HAMPAPURA VILLAGE
H.D.KOTE TALUK
MYSURU DISTRICT
8.
PUTTAMADAIAH
S/O KARIYAIAH
SINCE DECEASED BY LR’S
8(a) SMT. MARISIDDAMMA,
W/O. LATE PUTTAMADIAH
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS
HAMPAPURA VILLAGE & POST
4
W.P.No.1863/2008
H.D.KOTE TALUK
MYSURU DISTRICT – 571 125
8(b) SMT. MANJULA,
D/O. LATE PUTTAMADIAH
(ALREADY ON RECORD AS 9TH RESPONDENT)
9.
P MANJULA
D/O PUTTAMADAIAH
MARRIED, TEACHER
MADAPURA VILLAGE, GOVT. SCHOOL @
H.D.KOTE TALUK
R/AT HYRIGE VILLAGE
H.D.KOTE TALUK
MYSURU DISTRICT
... RESPONDENTS
(By SRI S.H. PRASHANTH, AGA FOR R1;
SRI B.J. SOMAYAJI, ADVOCATE FOR R2-R4;
SRI RAMESHA H.E, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI T.N. RAGHUPATHY, ADVOCATE FOR R5, R6(a-c),
R7, R8 (a & b) & R9)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES
226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING
TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4 TO CONSIDER
THE
NOTICE
OF
THE
PETITIONER
ISSUED
TO
RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4 VIDE ANNEXURE-G AND TAKE
NECESSARY ACTION TO RECOVER THE SCHEDULE
SITES FROM RESPONDENTS 5 TO 9 AND RE-GRANT THE
SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE PERSON WHO ARE REAL
POOR AND BACKWARD PEOPLE AND ELIGIBLE FOR THE
GRANT OF SITES AT HAMPAPURA VILLAGE AND
IMPLEMENT THE SCHEME PROPERLY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH LAW AND ETC.,
5
W.P.No.1863/2008
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR FINAL
HEARING THIS DAY, P.S. DINESH KUMAR, J. MADE THE
FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The grievance of the petitioners in this writ petition is
that the lands in question have been granted in favour of
private respondents contrary to Section 209 of the Panchayat
Raj Act, 1993.
2.
The petitioners have submitted a representation as per
Annexure-G to respondents No.1 to 4 herein and prayed for
consideration of their representation in this writ petition.
3.
Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and
learned Additional Government Advocate, we are of the view
that justice would be subserved by directing respondent No.2-
Chief Executive Officer, My
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.