SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MAHENDRA KUMAR A R – Appellant
Versus
THE TAHSILDAR – Respondent
WP/10206/2015



1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF MARCH, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.NARENDAR

WRIT PETITION No.10206/2015 (KLR-RES)

BETWEEN

MAHENDRA KUMAR A R

S/O RAMALINGAM M A

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO.27B,

12TH MAIN, SHUBHA ENCLAVE,

HARALURU ROAD,

BANGALORE-560 102

...PETITIONER

(BY SRI AMITH DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE)

AND

1. THE TAHSILDAR

BANGALORE EAST TALUK,

KRISHNARAJA PURAM,

BANGALORE-560036.

2. STATE OF KARNATAKA

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,

REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,

VIDHANA SOUDHA,

BANGALORE-560001.

...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI A.R.SRINIVASA, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE

ORDER DATED 07.11.2014 IN PROCEEDINGS NO.NCR/CR-03/14-

15, VIDE ANNEXURE-G BY ISSUING A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

ETC.

2

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY

HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE

FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo

praying leave of the Court to withdraw the petition.

Memo is taken on record.

Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

JUDGE

sma

CT-HR

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top