HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
K. NATARAJAN, J
R. K. SANTHOSH @ SANTHOSH @ KANNADA MAGA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P/314/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28th DAY OF JANUARY 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.314/2021
BETWEEN:
R.K.SANTHOSH @ SANTHOSH @ KANNADA MAGA,
S/O RADHAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
R/AT #190, 3RD CROSS,
ANDRA COLONY, A. NARAYANAPURA
DOORAVANINAGARA POST,
BANGALORE 56 0048.
.. PETITIONER
(BY SRI. M. KRISHNE GOWDA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
STATE BY MAHADEVAPURA P.S.
REPTD. BY HIGH COURT GOVT. PLEADER
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BANGALORE 560 001.
2. ANITA, W/O LATE CHALAPATHI,
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
R/AT 200, AMBEDKAR NAGAR,
MAHESHWARINAGARA, MAHADEVAPURA,
BANGALORE 560 048.
.. RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SHOWRI H.R., HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF
CR.P.C. PRAYING TO PASS AN ORDER OF INTERIM BAIL ALLOWING THE
2
PETITIONER IN (CRIME NO.433/2019) OF MAHADEVAPURA POLICE NOW
IN SPL. CASE NO.1356/19 AND PENDING BEFORE 70TH ADDL. CITY CIVIL
AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BANGALORE (CCH-71) FOR A PERIOD OF 15
DAYS FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 143, 144, 147,
148, 109, 302, 120B, 506B R/W 149 OF IPC AND U/S 3(1)(r), 3(2)(v) OF
SCT/ST IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH
VIDEO CONFERENCING HEARING AT DHARWAD BENCH, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
This is the third successive bail petition filed by the
petitioner/accused No.2 under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973, for grant of interim bail for fifteen days in Crime
No.433/2019 registered by the Mahadevapura Police for the offence
punishable under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148, 109, 302, 120B and
506B read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860,
(hereinafter referred to as the ‘IPC’, for brevity) and under Section
3(1)(r), 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes
(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, now in Spl. Case No.1356/19
and pending before the learned 70th Additional City Civil and
Sessions Judge, Bangalore.
2.
The case of the prosecution is that, on the complaint of
one Sri. Prasad Kumar-brother of the deceased-Chalapati, a case
3
was
registered
by
the
Mahadevapura
Police
against
the
petitioner/accused No.2 and others for the aforesaid offences on
13.09.2019 alleging that about 11.00 to 11.30 am, the accused
committed the murder of Chalapati when he was in the workshop.
The police arrested the petitioner and others and they have been
remanded to the judicial custody. The petitioner moved bail
petition before this Court as well as the trial Court which came to be
rejected. Successive bail petitions filed by the petitioner were also
rejected by this Court on 22.05.2020 and 23.10.2020 in Criminal
Petition
No.8824/2020
and
Criminal
Petition
No.4360/2020,
respectively and this petition is the third successive bail petition by
the petitioner/accused No.2.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended
that the mother of the accused Smt. Sumithra is suffering from
heart ailment. She has been admitted in the hospital and she is in
serious condition and requires medical care and attention from the
petitioner who is the only person to take care of his mother.
Hence, learned counsel prays that, interim bail for a short period
may be granted to the petitioner and the petitioner is ready to
4
surrender after providing some treatment to his mother. Though
the petition is filed for grant of fifteen days interim bail, but the
learned counsel prayed that at least thirty days may be granted.
4.
Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader for
the respondent-State objected to the petition and prayed not to
grant any interim bail. Hence, prayed for dismissal of the petition.
5.
On considering the arguments of the learned counsel
appearing on both sides and on perusal of the documents produced
by the lea