SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
P.S.DINESH KUMAR
MR BALKISHAN BOOB – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


ORDER

Heard Shri. Dhyan Chinnappa, learned Senior Advocate for petitioner and Shri. D.S. Ramachandra Reddy, learned Advocate for respondent.

2. M/s. Bhagwan Cotton Ginners Pvt. Ltd., has borrowed money from Bank of Maharashtra during 2014. Bank has initiated recovery proceedings. Property mortgaged to the Bank has been brought to auction. The owner of the mortgaged property has presented this writ petition with a prayer inter alia to direct respondent - Bank to consider petitioner's OTS offer made in his representation dated January 16, 2021 in terms of 'Maha Rahat Yojana

2020-21' and 'Maha Samadhan Yojna 2020-21'.

3. Shri. Dhyan Chinnappa submitted that petitioner has submitted his representation on January 16, 2021 (Annexure-S) with an offer to pay `4.4 Crores under the OTS Scheme. Since Bank has not considered the OTS proposal, petitioner has presented this writ petition. He submitted that the new OTS Scheme is non-discriminatory and non-discretionary in nature. As per the scheme, borrower's NPA account falls under the category 'Doubtful- III' which requires payment of 70% of the secured portion and 35% of the unsecured portion of the loan. Bank is duty bound to consider the OTS pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top