SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SMT. RAJALAKSHMI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


passed

by

Commissioner, it was found from the records that

guntas of land in an open auction. However, by virtue of

certain errors that had crept in the revenue records,

although what remained in Sy.No.78 was 4 acres and 12

guntas, however, the Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore

District,

vide

Official

Memorandum

bearing

No.LND(1)/CR.256/1978-79,

dated

03.05.1979

has

ordered for public auction of 20 acres and 05 guntas of

land in Sy.No.78 of Shettigere village, in exercise of

powers under Rule 12(2) of the Karnataka Land Grant

Rules, 1969. However, it was also noticed in terms of the

sketch

prepared,

it

was

evidenced

- 9 -

Sri.R.Ashwathnarayana and his family members were in

occupation of land in Sy.No.79 also. Therefore, in order to

solve the problem, it was directed that the authority shall

accord approval for change of spot from Sy.No.78 to

Sy.No.79 in terms of the power conferred by the

on

Commissioner

vide

Government Circular No.RD 93 LGB 79 dated 20.03.1980.

Consequently, by the said order dated 25.02.2013, the

Special Deputy Commissioner directed the Tahsildar,

Bangalore North (Additional) Taluk, Bangalore, to initiate

action for phodi of Sy.No.78 and submit proposals to t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top