- 1 -
W.P.No.1461 of 2022 C/W W.P.No.1371 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 1461 OF 2022 (KLR-RES)
C/W
WRIT PETITION NO. 1371 OF 2016 (KLR-RES)
IN W.P.NO. 1461 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. RAJALAKSHMI
W/O LATE R.N ASHWATHA NARAYANA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
2.
SMT. R.A. SHARADHA
D/O LATE R.N. ASWATHA NARAYANA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
3.
SRI. R.A. PUNEETH
S/O LATE R.N. ASWATHA NARAYANA
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
4.
SRI.R.A. NARESH
S/O LATE R.N. ASWATHA NARAYANA
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
ALL ARE R/AT NO.8,
ASWATHA NARAYANA NILAYA
3RD CROSS, JYOTHINAGAR
AMBABHAVANI TEMPLE ROAD,
VIDYARANYAPURA POST
BANGALORE 560097
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. MADHUSUDHAN R NAIK, SENIOR COUNSEL
FOR SRI. JAGADEESH C K., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by
JUANITA THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH COURT
OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
W.P.No.1461 of 2022 C/W W.P.No.1371 of 2016
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
M.S. BUILDING
AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE 560 001
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISISONER
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT
BEHIND KANDAYA BHAVANA
K.G. ROAD
BANGALORE 560009
3.
THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT (NORTH)
BEHIND KANDAYA BHAANA
K.G. ROAD,
BANGALORE 560009
4.
THE TAHSILDAR
BANGLAORE NORTH ADDTIONAL TALUK
HOTEL SHARAVATHI BUILDING, 3RD FLOOR
YELAHANKA NEW TOWN
BANGALORE 560064
5.
BANGALORE METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD
REPRESNETED BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
B.M.T.C COMPLEX
3RD FLOOR, K.H. ROAD,
SHANTHINAGAR
BANGALORE 560 027
6.
THE KARNATAKA INDUSTIRAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD-METRO
REPRESENTED BY ITS
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
NO.14/3, ARAVINDA BHAVANA,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BANGALORE-560002.
…RESPONDENTS
- 3 -
W.P.No.1461 of 2022 C/W W.P.No.1371 of 2016
(BY SRI. SESHU V. HCGP, FOR R1 TO R4
SRI. NAGANAND S.S., SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. HARISH N.N., ADVOCATE FOR R5
SRI. P.V. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R6)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
IMPUGNED LETTER/ORDER DTD 15.10.2020 VIDE ANNX-A AND
DIRECT/DECLARE TO THE R-2 AND R-4 DIRECTING THEM TO
IMPLEMENT THE ORDER/DIRECTION ISSUED BY THE R-3 THE
ORDER/DIRECTION ISSUED BY THE R-3 IN PROCEEDINGS
VIDE ANNX-E TO THE WRIT PETITION AND TO CONSIDER THE
REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONERS VIDE ANNX-L AND M.
AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO. 1371 OF 2016
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. RAJALAKSHMI
W/O LATE R.N ASHWATHA NARAYANA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
2.
SMT. R.A. SHARADHA
D/O LATE R.N. ASWATHA NARAYANA
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
3.
SRI. R.A. PUNITH
S/O LATE R.N. ASWATHA NARAYANA
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
4.
SRI.R.A. NARESH
S/O LATE R.N. ASWATHA NARAYANA
AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS
1 TO 4 ARE R/AT NO.8,
53/2, SHARADA NILAYA
4TH MAIN, MATTIKERE EXTENSION
BENGALURU- 560054.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. NISHANTH A.V., ADVOCATE)
- 4 -
W.P.No.1461 of 2022 C/W W.P.No.1371 of 2016
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
M.S. BUILDING
AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE 560 001
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISISONER
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT
BANGALORE 560001
3.
THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT
BANGALORE
4.
THE TAHASILDAR
BANGLAORE NORTH ADDTIONAL TALUK
YELAHANKA, BANGALORE.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SESHU V. HCGP)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT
THE R4 TO COMPLY WITH THE ORDER DTD. 25.02.2013 IN
CASE NO.9 RRT (2) CR-2B/2001-02 PASSED BY THE SPECIAL
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER VIDE ANNX-D, IN SO FAR AS THE
SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC.,
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
- 5 -
W.P.No.1461 of 2022 C/W W.P.No.1371 of 2016
COMMON ORDER
R.DEVDAS J., (ORAL):
These two writ petitions are filed by the same parties
as petitioners. In W.P.No.1371/2016, the prayer is to issue
a writ of mandamus directing the respondent-Tahsildar,
Bangalore North Taluk, Yalahanka to comply with the
orders dated 25.02.2013 in case No.RRT (2) CR-2B/2001-
2002, passed by the Special Deputy Commissioner, insofar
as the schedule property is concerned. There are other
prayers also made in the said writ petition. During the
course of the said writ proceedings, the respondent-
Tahsildar is said to have handed over 18 acres and 01
gunta of land in Sy.No.79 of Shettigere village, Jala Hobli,
Yalahanka Taluk, excluding 4 acres and 39 guntas, to
respondent No.5-Bangalore Metro Rail Project Corporation
(hereinafter referred to as ‘BMRCL’ for short). Questioning
the said action of the Tahsildar, the subsequent writ
petition in W.P.No.1461/2022 was filed. A similar prayer
seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent-
- 6 -
W.P.No.1461 of 2022 C/W W.P.No.1371 of 2016
Tahsildar to follow the directions given in No.RRT(2)CR-
2B/2001-2002, is reiterated in the second petition.
2. Learned Senior Counsel Sri.Madhusudhan R Naik,
appearing
for
the
petitioners
submits
that
Sri.R.N.Ashwathanarayana purchased 20 acres and 05
guntas of land in an open action conducted by the State
Government through the revenue authorities. However, it
was found that there was some discrepancy in the
mentioning of Survey Numbers. To that extent there has
been some confusion as to whether the entire 20 acres
and 05 guntas was in Sy.No.78 or 79 or whether it
encompasses a portion in the two Survey Numbers.
Nevertheless,
when
the
issue
of
unauthorized
encroachment was raised on the floor of the House, a Joint
House Committee for detection of encroachment of
Government
land
in
Bangalore
Urban
under
the
Chairmanship of Sri.A.T.Ramaswamy was constituted by
the Government. The Joint House Committee submitted
two interim reports during February, 2007 and July, 2007.
- 7 -
W.P.No.1461 of 2022 C/W W.P.No.1371 of 2016
It appears that the committee detected large scale
encroachment on government land. The Government
constituted the Task Force for Recovery and Protection of
public
land
under
the
Chairmanship
of
B.V.Balasubramaniyan, IAS (Retired). In order to expedite
the process of removal of the encroachments and the
recovery of the encroached lands, the government created
three posts of the Special Deputy Commissioners for
Bangalore Urban District vide a Government Order No.RD
711 LGB 2009 (P), Bangalore, dated 04.06.2010. The
powers under Section 136(3) of the Karnataka Land
Revenue Act, 1946 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’, for
short) vested in the Deputy Commissioner was delegated
to the Special Deputy Commissioners in the newly created
posts vide a Government Notification dated 29.08.2012 for
the jurisdiction of Bangalore North and Bangalore North
(Additional) Taluks.
3. Consequent to the powers conferred on the
Special
Deputy
Commissioner,
the
Special
Deputy
- 8 -
W.P.No.1461 of 2022 C/W W.P.No.1371 of 2016
Commissioner, Bangalore North and Bangalore North
(Additional) Taluks conducted an enquiry and in terms of
the powers vested under Section 136(3) of the Act, the
Special Deputy Commissioner passed an order dated
25.02.2013. Learned Senior Counsel submits that in
terms
of
the
said
passed
by
Commissioner, it was found from the records that
guntas of land in an open auction. However, by virtue of
certain errors that had crept in the revenue records,
although what remained in Sy.No.78 was 4 acres and 12
guntas, however, the Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore
District,
vide
Official
Memorandum
bearing
No.LND(1)/CR.256/1978-79,
dated
03.05.1979
has
ordered for public auction of 20 acres and 05 guntas of
land in Sy.No.78 of Shettigere village, in exercise of
powers under Rule 12(2) of the Karnataka Land Grant
Rules, 1969. However, it was also noticed in terms of the
sketch
prepared,
it
was
evidenced
- 9 -
Sri.R.Ashwathnarayana and his family members were in
occupation of land in Sy.No.79 also. Therefore, in order to
solve the problem, it was directed that the authority shall
accord approval for change of spot from Sy.No.78 to
Sy.No.79 in terms of the power conferred by the
on
Commissioner
vide
Government Circular No.RD 93 LGB 79 dated 20.03.1980.
Consequently, by the said order dated 25.02.2013, the
Special Deputy Commissioner directed the Tahsildar,
Bangalore North (Additional) Taluk, Bangalore, to initiate
action for phodi of Sy.No.78 and submit proposals to the
Deputy Commissioner for change of spot in respect of 15
acres and 33 guntas of land from Sy.No.78 to Sy.No.79 in
favour of Sri.R.N.Ashwathnarayana in terms of the order
dated 20.03.1980 and thereupon initiate proposal for the
phodi of land in Sy.No.79.
4. Learned Senior Counsel submits that however
since it was found that the powers exercisable under
Section 136(3) could not have been delegated to a Special
- 10 -
Deputy Commissioner, who is not in the cadre of IAS, the
State Government issued a Government Notification dated
10.10.2014 withdrawing the powers of the Special Deputy
Commissioner to deal with the matters pertaining to
Section 136(3) with retrospective effect. Learned Senior
Counsel would submit that although the grounds have
been raised in the writ petitions, challenging the validity of
the Notification dated 10.10.2014 to retrospectively
withdraw the powers which were conferred on the Special
Deputy Commissioner and thereby setting at naught the
orders passed by the Special Deputy Commissioner,
nevertheless, since the said notification dated 10.10.2014
and its validity are said to have been upheld by the
Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.51551-
52/2013, dated 26.08.2014, therefore, without pressing
on the validity of the Government Notification dated
10.10.2014, learned Senior Counsel would submit that if
similar directions are given as was done in the case of
SRI.N.RAMAMURTHY VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND
- 11 -
OTHERS,
W.P.No.16255/2018
dated
14.11.2018,
directing that the matter should be reconsidered by a
Deputy Commissioner of IAS cadre, it would suffice.
However, the learned Senior Counsel would bring to the
notice of this Court certain interim orders passed
restraining the revenue authorities from doing anything to
disturb the possession of the petitioners of the land in
question. Nevertheless, the Tahsildar has proceeded to
hand over the acquired land in terms of the impugned
communication dated 15.10.2020 at Annexure-A in
W.P.No.1461/2022.
Learned
Senior
Counsel
would
therefore submit that the action on the part of the
Tahsildar in taking upon himself the right to hand over the
land in question should be held illegal and quashed and
the petitioner is agreeable to say that he has voluntarily
handed over the possession of the acquired land to the
Karnataka
Industrial
Areas
Development
Board
(hereinafter referred to as ‘KIADB’, for short). Learned
Senior Counsel submits that the petitioners are not
- 12 -
challenging the acquisition proceedings, however, they are
entitled to seek compensation and if they are not satisfied
with the compensation, they are entitled to seek
enhancement of the compensation in accordance with law.
Learned
Senior
Counsel
Sri.S.S.Naganand,
appearing for respondent No.5-Bangalo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.