SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
NINGAPPA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP/13350/2018



1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G. PANDIT

WRIT PETITION No.13350/2018 (S-RES)

BETWEEN:

1. NINGAPPA

S/O MALLAPPA BADIGER

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

STAFF NURSE.

2. BASAVARAJ

S/O HANAMAPPA ITAL

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

STAFF NURSE.

3. SMT. SHOBHAR K

W/O NAVEEN P

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

STAFF NURSE.

4. SMT. SHUBHA G

D/O ANNAPURNA

AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS

STAFF NURSE.

5. SMT. SHWETHA C R

D/O REVENNA C K

AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

STAFF NURSE.

6. N M DEEPIKA

D/O MOHAN NAIK

AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

STAFF NURSE.

7. GEETHA VITTAL MANTOOR

D/O VITTAL MANTOOR

AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS

2

JUNIOR MEDICAL LAB

TECHNOLOGIST.

8. NAGARAJU S

S/O SIDDACHAR

AGED ABOUT 42 EARS

JUNIOR MEDICAL LAB

TECHNOLOGIST.

9. DARSHAN KUMAR A R

S/O RAMACHANDRAPPA

AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS

JUNIOR MEDICAL LAB

TECHNOLOGIST.

10. DEEPA N

D/O NARAYAN V

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

JUNIOR MEDICAL LAB

TECHNOLOGIST.

PETITIONERS ARE WORKING IN

KIDWAI CANCER INSTITUTE /

KIDWAI MEMORIAL INSTITUTE

OF ONCOLOGY

DR.M.H.MARIGOWDA ROAD

BANGALORE-560029.

...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI.SHAILENDRA M R, ADV.)

AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA

REPRESENTED BY ITS

PRINCIPLE SECRETARY

MEDICAL EDUCATION DEPT

M S BUILDING

DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI

BANGALORE-560 001.

2. THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL

EDUCATION IN KARNATAKA

ANANDA RAO CIRCLE

BANGALORE-560 009.

3

3. KIDWAI CANCER INSTITUTE /

KIDWAI MEMORIAL INSTITUTE

OF ONCOLOGY

DR.M.H.MARIGOWDA ROAD

BANGALORE-560 029.

4. KARNATAKA NURSING PARA

MEDICAL REGULATING AUTHORITY

NO.5, NEW NO.40/20A

LAKSHMI COMPLEX, 1ST FLOOR

VANI VILAS HOSPITAL

FORT ROAD

BANGALORE-560 002.

5. THE KARNATAKA STATE DIPLOMA

IN NURSING EXAMINATION BOARD

1ST FLOOR, LIBRARY BLOCK

BMCRI CAMPUS

BANGALORE-560 002

REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI.M SANDESH KUMAR, HCGP FOR R1 & R2

SRI. ARAVIND V CHAVAN, ADV. FOR R3

R4- SERVED)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH

THE NOTIFICATIONS DATED 09.03.2018 VIDE ANNEX-C AND D

ISSUED BY R3 AS BEING ARBITRARY AND ILLEGAL AND ETC.

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH

VIDEO CONFERENCE THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE

FOLLOWING:-

4

O R D E R

Sri M.R. Shailendra, learned counsel for the

petitioners appears through video conference and

submits that the writ petition has become infructuous

as the petitioners’ prayer would not survive for

consideration.

Submission of the learned counsel for the

petitioners is placed on record.

Writ petition is dismissed as having become

infructuous.

Sd/-

JUDGE

NG*

CT:bms

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top