HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.N.SATYANARAYANA
SMT VENKUBAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP/24890/2018
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF APRIL 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA
WRIT PETITION NO.24890 OF 2018 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
SMT. VENKUBAI
W/O LATE VENKOBARAO,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
R/AT FORT, HOSAKOTE TALUK,
HOSAKOTE – 562 114,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI. JAYAKUMAR S. PATIL, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. A. MOHAMMED TAHIR, ADV.,)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU – 560 001,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,
VISVESHWARAIAH TOWER,
AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU – 560 001.
3.
THE TAHSILDAR
HOSKOTE TALUK,
HOSKOTE – 562 114.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VENKATESH DODDERI, AGA)
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT DATED 26.10.2015 PASSED BY THE R-3
VIDE ANNEXURE-N AND TO DIRECT THE R-3 TO RESTORE THE
MUTATION ENTRY IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN KHATHA AND
RTC IN RESPECT OF 1-36 ACRE AND GUNTAS IN SY. NO.265 OF
HOSAKOTE KASABA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT AS EXISTED
PRIOR TO 1988 AS PER ANNEXURE-C.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
This
writ
petition
is
filed
seeking
quashing
of
endorsement No.RRT[K]CR:68/2015-16 dated 26.10.2015
vide Annexure-N and also for a writ of mandamus, directing
Respondent No.3, namely, Tahsildar of Hosakote Taluk to
restore khata of land bearing Sy. No.265 measuring 1 acre 36
guntas of Hosakote Kasaba, Bengaluru Rural District, in the
name of the petitioner.
2.
The case of the petitioner is that she is grantee of
aforesaid extent of land and pursuant to the grant made in
her favour, the entries are registered in her name in the
record of rights and consequently RTC also issued in her
3
name from the years 1984 to 1989. It is her grievance that
subsequently her name has been removed from RTC.
3.
It is also contended that possession of the
aforesaid land with the petitioner is not in dispute, in as
much as, petitioner had filed a suit earlier in O.S.
No.574/1979 for an order of permanent injunction against
the State. Though the suit was dismissed, in an appeal filed
in R.A. No.48/1981, she has secured an order of permanent
injunction by Judgment and decree dated 17.10.1981, which
according to her, is continuing undisturbed.
4.
It is also stated that proceedings were initiated for
removal of khata from her name, in the meanwhile, an order
was passed by the respondents granting an area measuring
100 ft x 100 ft belonging to the petitioner in favour of Social
Welfare Department for construction of Hospital. The same
was subject matter of challenge by the petitioner before the
Karnataka Appellate Tribunal in Appeal No.1126/2004,
which came to be allowed by Order dated 2.12.2011. With
4
this, possession of the petitioner to the aforesaid extent of
land is confirmed, therefore, revenue entries are also to be
restored in her name. It is in this background, the present
writ petition is filed.
5.
In this matter, this Court directed the Tahsildar of
Hosakote Taluk to be present before the Court along with
original records available in the said office with reference to
the land in Sy. No.265 of Hosakote Kasaba. It is in response
to the order of this Court, Tahsildar, Hosakote Taluk is
present before the Court on more than one occasion along
with RTC book which is maintained with reference to land
bearing Sy. No.265 of the village from the years 1984-85 to
1988-89 and also mutation entry register available in the said
office. Meanwhile, the petitioner was also directed to produce
the original of saguvali chit, which, is not produced, inspite of
granting sufficient opportunity.
5