HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
K.S.MUDAGAL
SRI. SURENDRA SHETTY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY – Respondent
WP/21700/2018
WP.NO.21700/2018
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE Mrs. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
WRIT PETITION NO.21700 OF 2018(GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. SURENDRA SHETTY
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
SON OF RAMESH SHETTY
RESIDING AT SAHANA ESTATE
ANKADAKATTE, KOTESHWARA VILLAGE
KUNDAPURA TALUK- 576 222.
... PETITIONER
(By Sri. P.P. HEGDE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
INSPECTOR OF POLICE
KUNDAPURA CIRCLE
KUNDAPURA
UDUPI DISTRICT – 576 201.
2.
DIRECTOR GENERAL AND
INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
POLICE HEAD QUARTERS NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU, KARNATAKA – 560 001.
3.
SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
NO.49, KHANIJA BHAVANA
RACE COURSE ROAD
BANGALORE – 560 001.
WP.NO.21700/2018
2
4.
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
AND DISTRICT MEGISTRATE
RAJATADRI, MANIPAL
KARNATAKA – 576 104.
5.
SRI. BHOOBALAN T., I.A.S.,
SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE
KUNDAPURA SUB DIVISION
UDUPI DISTRICT – 576 201.
... RESPONDENTS
(By SMT. NAMITHA MAHESH B.G., HCGP FOR R1 TO R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT R1 TO 3 TO
CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED:
17.04.2018 VIDE ANNEX-G AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘ B’
GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the
first respondent has filed the chargesheet in the matter, reserving
liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, petition may
be dismissed as withdrawn.
2. Recording the submission, the petition is dismissed as
withdrawn. The petitioner is at liberty to seek appropriate remedy.
Sd/-
JUDGE
bnv*