PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SRI SUDHAKAR RAJACHAR – Appellant
Versus
SRI M P PRAHALAD RAO – Respondent
The present revision petition has been filed by the
accused, challenging the judgment of conviction and order
on
sentence
passed
by
the
Trial
Court
in
C.C.No.28301/2016, holding the accused guilty for the
offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter for brevity referred to as
the “N.I. Act”), which was further confirmed by the
Sessions Judge's Court in the appeal filed by him.
Challenging the impugned judgments of conviction
and order on sentence passed by the trail court and
confirmed by the Sessions Judge’s Court, the petitioner
has filed the present revision petition.
3
2. Learned counsels from both side along with their
respective clients, as identified by their learned counsels,
are physically present in the Court.
3. Learned counsels from both side have filed a joint
application - I.A.No.1/2022, under Section 147 of the
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter for brevity
referred to as "the N.I. Act"), along with affidavits filed by
both side reporting the settlement between them by way of
compromise and seeking acquittal of the petitioner herein
(accused) in C.C. No.28301/2016.
4. Learned counsels
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.