SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SRI SUDHAKAR RAJACHAR – Appellant
Versus
SRI M P PRAHALAD RAO – Respondent


The present revision petition has been filed by the

accused, challenging the judgment of conviction and order

on

sentence

passed

by

the

Trial

Court

in

C.C.No.28301/2016, holding the accused guilty for the

offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable

Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter for brevity referred to as

the “N.I. Act”), which was further confirmed by the

Sessions Judge's Court in the appeal filed by him.

Challenging the impugned judgments of conviction

and order on sentence passed by the trail court and

confirmed by the Sessions Judge’s Court, the petitioner

has filed the present revision petition.

3

2. Learned counsels from both side along with their

respective clients, as identified by their learned counsels,

are physically present in the Court.

3. Learned counsels from both side have filed a joint

application - I.A.No.1/2022, under Section 147 of the

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter for brevity

referred to as "the N.I. Act"), along with affidavits filed by

both side reporting the settlement between them by way of

compromise and seeking acquittal of the petitioner herein

(accused) in C.C. No.28301/2016.

4. Learned counsels

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top