SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SRI S. ABDUL RAHIM – Appellant
Versus
THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER – Respondent


1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2021

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI

WRIT PETITION.NO.5203 OF 2014 (LB-RES)

BETWEEN

SRI S.ABDUL RAHIM

AGED 57 YEARS

S/O HASANABBA

R/O SURALPADI, NEAR CHECK POST

KARIKAMBLA, BAJPE VILLAGE

MANGALORE TALUK

D.K.DISTRICT.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI RAJARAMA.S, ADVOCATE)

AND

1.

THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER,

TALUK PANCHAYAT, TALUK PANCHAYATH,

MANGALORE TALUK,

DK DISTRICT-575001.

2.

THE SECRETARY,

BAJPE VILLAGE PANCHAYATH,

MANGALORE TALUK-575001,

REP. BY ITS PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER.

3.

THE JOSEPH SYLESTER D SOUZA,

AGED 66 YEARS,

S/O LATE MARCEL D SOUZA,

VINCENT VILLA, THAREKAMBLA

BAJAPE, MANGALORE TQ

DK DISTRICT-575001.

4.

LALITHA D SOUZA,

AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,

W/O JOSEPH SYLESTER D' SOUZA,

VINCENT VILLA, THAREKAMBLE,

2

BAJAPE, MANGALORE TQ,

DK DISTRICT0575001.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI P.P.HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1,

SRI CYRIL PRASAD PAIS, ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R4

R2 SERVED)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

AND 227 OF T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top